Would you spend $10 on a collection of 30 second song clips?

Zinio are offering a special edition Rolling Stone Magazine. The issue is titled "500 Greatest Songs of All Time", and it costs $9.99. It comes with a collection of the 500 songs mentioned in the title. The only problem is that you don't get the complete songs. (TBH, I wouldn't have expected Rolling Stone to be able to pull that off because of rights issues). Instead they included a 30 second clip of each song.

I'm a little annoyed about this. I feel that the 30 second clip is worse than nothing at all. This is an example of paid content not being worth nearly as much as the pirated free content.

Do you know what, I actually came up with a better idea while writing this post. I think they should have included a link for each song that would lead to either a Youtube clip or some other legit hosting site. That way people could hear the full song.

About Nate Hoffelder (11789 Articles)
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader:"I've been into reading ebooks since forever, but I only got my first ereader in July 2007. Everything quickly spiraled out of control from there. Before I started this blog in January 2010 I covered ebooks, ebook readers, and digital publishing for about 2 years as a part of MobileRead Forums. It's a great community, and being a member is a joy. But I thought I could make something out of how I covered the news for MobileRead, so I started this blog."

2 Comments on Would you spend $10 on a collection of 30 second song clips?

  1. Heh. Most of the YouTube music is illegit. And legit ones fall under the streaming royalty scheme — which is why only the music companies themselves post them and are stingy about which ones they post.

    In a few days, someone will probably due a website for those songs. This is the Internet, dammit!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


%d bloggers like this: