Various companies have apps and sell content on the iPhone, iPad. Some sell from inside the app and some sell from their website (outside the app). The Kindle is an example of selling ebooks outside the app; Kindle ebooks are sold from a website that Amazon maintain just for iOS. The key detail here: You don't have to sell inside the app. But if you sell inside the app, you give Apple 30%. Apple is fine with either option.
Apple changed the developer's agreement again (they do this a lot). A new rule is added, but (as far as we are concerned) nothing changes in how any rule is enforced. Apps are approved after the new rule is released in exactly the same state as they were before the new rule. Here is the rule:
Apps utilizing a system other than the In App Purchase API (IAP) to purchase content, functionality, or services in an app will be rejected
Apple changed how they interpreted that rule. Now Apple are telling the app makers that if they sell digital content outside the app they must also sell it inside the app. Note: the rule has not been changed since September. Note: Apple did not require in-app sales before January. Remember, if you sell in-app then you must give Apple 30%. The major ebookstores cannot afford to give Apple 30%.
This story broke in The Wall Street Journal in early February.
A developer who used to work for Kobo wrote a post and explained why the in-app option won't work for any of the ebookstores. The in-app code is designed to work with at most 3,000 items. That would mean that you could not have an ebook catalog the size of Amazon's (800 thousand titles).
So at this point we have Apple demanding money that no one can afford to pay, and we have Apple insisting that everyone use a system that cannot work for any of the larger ebookstores.
It looks like Apple screwed everyone over on purpose, doesn't it?This leaves out a lot of details, including the responses from various app makers and the fact that Apple is under investigation by the FTC. But this should be enough to explain my post yesterday.
image via Flickr