This boycott comes as a response to Random House hiking the prices it charges libraries for ebooks. Early in March RH announced that it would now charge libraries 3 times the going retail price for ebooks. Naturally this did not go over well in some quarters. "The sharp price increase instituted by Random House will limit the number of ebooks SSPL can purchase for our borrowers' enjoyment," Myers added.
While I'm sure that some libraries are boycotting RH, I seriously doubt that it's more than a handful. I was at a library conference a couple weeks back, and Random House's ebook prices were a hot topic.
I overheard at least a half dozen conversations on this, and none of the librarians mentioned any interest in a boycott. All were cutting back on the number of RH ebooks they purchased, but most still bought them. The attitudes ranged from mild frustration to acceptance, and none were annoyed enough to call for a boycott.
What's more, there was even one librarian who justified the prices. She's a librarian for the US Navy, and she saw the price increases as simply more of the same. Libraries have always paid more than consumers for better quality books, and the pricier ebooks simply expanded that into digital, as she saw it. After all, library ebooks are bound to last longer and be used more than when the same title is purchased by consumers, so she thought it made sense for them to cost more.
Now, when I covered the price hike last month, I was livid. I thought then that the prices were extortionate (I still think that). But that's not all that common of an attitude among librarians. I suppose that a lot are thinking about the other major publishers like Penguin, Macmillan, or Simon & Schuster - you know, the ones who don't allow library ebooks at all.
As bad as the price hikes might be, there are greater evils.