The pilot will only cover a limited number of courses at each university, and participation will be mandatory in those courses, which means this is going to work much the same way as the UMinn program I posted on a couple months back.
Students will get to use the digital textbooks for free, and if they like they can also buy a POD copy. The digital textbook platform will be provided by Courseload, an Indianapolis based startup which has been working on a digital textbook platform for some years now.
Now, if the goal is to save students money then the pilot will be a roaring success. Students don't have to pay anything to participate; each university will pay the fee out of their operating budget. That's all well and good for the pilot, but at some point the universities will need to pass the cost along to the students.
There's an important question that this pilot will have missed, and it really needs to be asked: Will students think it's in their own financial best interest to go along with the program?
The pilot cannot answer that because we don't know what the students will end up paying. For all we know the discount offered by the volume purchase might not even be as good as the price of a used textbook found online. And yes, price is the most important detail; no matter how great a platform might be if students don't have the money they won't be able to get it.
In fact, I have to wonder if divorcing the price from this pilot was part of someone's plan. The pilot will get the schools and students used to the idea of bulk licensing without giving the students a reason to resist.
I've posited in the past that much of the current digital textbook hype is exactly that, and I'm afraid that this pilot is more of the same. It bothers me deeply that this pilot is pitched as a way to explore a new business model and the students' money is not changing hands. I don't see how you can evaluate an idea for a new way to sell digital textbooks when you test only half of it.
image by showbizsuperstar