I've just finished reading a review of the beagle in The Guardian. The reviewer (Michael Grothaus, who also writes for TUAW) liked it because it was cheaper than the Kindle and fit in his pocket. (I'm not sure why that is a plus over the Kindle; my K4 fits in my pocket just fine.) He also mistakenly claims it is absurdly cheap; which is only true if you ignore the cost of the cellphone contract.
And he glosses over the format limitations and completely fails to mention how this ereader is dependent on an app which only runs on Android 4.0 and above, thus putting it out of the reach of 70% or more Android smartphone owners.
But what's more important than the review are the comments.
Michael tries to downplay the fact that this device can only be bought via a cell phone contract, but most all of the commenters are raising that as a red flag. Between the folks who don't have a smartphone, don't have a contract, and don't want to get one just to get this device, there is a significant majority of readers who will never want to buy it.
What's also interesting about these commenters is that no one sees the format support as a limitation. I had thought that the general difficulty in loading content would be a downside, but I could be wrong. Or this could be an issue which most people don't realize will be a problem until after they encounter it. I'm looking forward to finding out.
If that review is any sign, txtr has drastically overestimated the market for this device. I'm sure they're going to sell a lot of the devices to telecoms, but I also expect a lot of those devices to end up in the refurbished and remaindered sales department.
In fact, that was the beagle's likely fate even if it had been a good device; even decent Android tablets get returned a lot. My first good 7" tablet was a refurb; I still like the original Galaxy Tab.
And while those refurbs likely won't impact the current sales of the txtr beagle, they also likely won't have much affect on the ebook market
via The Guardian