WSJ Claims Apple is Working on an iPad Maxi – I Still Say No

modbook proRemember that rumor that came out of Korea in early June about Apple supposedly working on a 12.9" iPad? The WSJ is reviving the rumor and claiming that they have new sources:

Apple and its Asian suppliers are testing larger screens for iPhones and tablets, officials at the company's suppliers say.

In recent months, Apple has asked for prototype smartphone screens larger than 4 inches and has also asked for screen designs for a new tablet device measuring slightly less than 13 inches diagonally, they said.

This rumor is being repeated all over the blogosphere, but I don't give it any credence. This rumor has every sign of being recycled, it's coming from a source that lacks credibility, and it is simply too thin to take seriously.

Given that this is basically the same rumor as the one from early June, let me repeat part of why I thought that rumor was bunk:

It's pretty simple, actually: There already is an iPad Maxi.

It's called the Modbook Pro, and it is made with the implicit approval of Apple. It has a 13.3" screen, runs OSX 10.8, and costs $3200 and up.

...

The first thing I realized about a 12.9" tablet is that the screen size alone is enough to move it out of the "laptop accessory" category and into the "laptop alternative". Trying to shove a 12" tablet and a 12" laptop into a single bag would be kinda awkward, so users are going to want to carry one or the other. Also, by the time you add enough battery life to support that 12.9" screen you already have a rather hefty device, so you might as well go all the way and give the tablet a more powerful CPU as well as the ability to run a full OS, not a mobile OS like iOS (which runs on the iPad and iPhone).

I would agree that this tablet is worth making, but that's my point.

Someone already is making the tablet: Axiotron.

And this rumor is even less credible.

First,the actual rumor here consists of a single sentence. That's just not enough substance. Also, it's not completely clear that the WSJ has actual sources of their own. For all we know the WSJ could literally be recycling old rumors. Given their past coverage of tech rumors I would not put it past them.

The thing is, I've largely stopped believing any tech rumors reported by the WSJ; they're just not credible any more.

These are the folks that took an unsubstantiated rumor that Microsoft may have ordered small screens and spun it into a report that Microsoft had a smartphone in the works (I satirized that WSJ story). In fact, that is a pattern that the WSJ follows with many of their stories about tech rumors.

Someone  give me a nudge when a real news story shows up, willya?

About Nate Hoffelder (11588 Articles)
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader:"I've been into reading ebooks since forever, but I only got my first ereader in July 2007. Everything quickly spiraled out of control from there. Before I started this blog in January 2010 I covered ebooks, ebook readers, and digital publishing for about 2 years as a part of MobileRead Forums. It's a great community, and being a member is a joy. But I thought I could make something out of how I covered the news for MobileRead, so I started this blog."

5 Comments on WSJ Claims Apple is Working on an iPad Maxi – I Still Say No

  1. This reminds me of an article by MG Siegler I saw in my news trawl today, in which he observes that tech news these days tends to be 75% sort of true, 15% complete bullshit, and 5% true.

1 Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. New Rumors Claim Apple's 12.9" iPad Maxi is in Final Prep for a March 2014 Launch - The Digital Reader

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*