As you might recall, a story has been going around (largely at the instigation of Hugh Howey) that at the Giant Book Fair on Saturday, self-published authors were maligned with the label "aspiring author". First-hand reports tended to disagree with that claim. I already adequately covered this story on Sunday night, so I won't repeat myself. But I do wish to address Hugh's claim that self-published authors were labeled "aspiring".
Imagine selling two million books, having half a dozen of your novels hit the New York Times bestseller list, being inundated with thousands of fan emails every month, and then having someone call you an “aspiring writer.”
That’s what happened to some authors in New Orleans this weekend, when the planners of the RT Booklovers Convention decided to place self-published authors in a dinky room off to the side while the traditionally published authors sat at tables in the grand ballroom.
It turns out that the label of aspiring author did in fact exist. Several sources report that it was one of many badge ribbons which attendees could add to their conference badges. According to Mur Lafferty, it was voluntary:
RT gave away several identifying badge ribbons. I received one that said “Published Author.” Another one I saw several people wearing was “Aspiring Author.” People weren’t forced to wear these. Aspiring wasn’t a derogatory term. Aspiring also didn’t mean indie.
And according to another attendee, self-published authors also got the ribbon which said "published author":
And when you add in the fact that numerous people, starting with the convention organizers (and continuing on to include a dozen or more who have no reason to defend the organizers), have denied that anyone intentionally cast the aspersion that indies were aspiring and not published authors - I can't help but conclude that there is much ado about nothing here.
And don't forget that RT has a reputation of inclusion, and a history of supporting self-published authors long before anyone took them seriously:
I wasn’t there, but RTBookclub has always championed ebooks and self-published authors. They were the first to review the early ebooks in the Nineties, they’ve always included ebook and self-published authors into all their events, and they’ve added special awards for ebook only and self-published books in their annual awards.
This makes it hard to believe they are prejudicial.
At this point I would say that it is damned clear that this is not nearly the story that Hugh Howey and a few others would make it out to be. The status of self-published authors wasn't under attack, it wasn't diminished, and they weren't, to use Hugh's words "being forced to sit in the backlist".
While there are plenty of real issues affecting authors everyday, this isn't one of them, and it is past time to stop pretending that it is.
Thanks, Jeremy, Marilynn!