The service is currently only available to iPad owners, but an Android app is in the works. The iPad app is buggy (it won't work right on my iPad 2), but nevertheless I am still intrigued by the idea that iFlipd is trying to promote.
iFlipd wants to charge $2 for a week-long rental. Their selection is currently limited, so there is nothing that I would want to pay to read, but if you did rent an ebook and finish it early you could then flip it to another user. The ebook would go into a pool, and if another user takes it out of the pool they would pay $1 to finish out the rental period. (It's also possible to continue to rent an ebook until you reach the sale price, effectively buying the ebook.))
I haven't had a chance to use the iFlipd app (the interface hangs off the bottom left corner of my screen). iFlipd also uses a faux book design for reading ebooks, which turns me off. Nevertheless I am still interested in iFlipd.
In spite of the technical issues, I think this is a platform worth investing in. The business model for iFlipd might repel the major publishers ($2 for a 7-day rental which can be shared is just not a lot of money), which is a shame because iFlipd has hidden potential for discovery.
If you look at iFlipd in terms of its own revenue stream, it probably won't amount to enough to interest publishers. But when you consider it in terms of sales it can generate elsewhere then it suddenly becomes more appealing.
I am talking about discovery.
Between kids, work, and life, there are a lot of people who won't be able to finish a rented ebook in 7 days. They'll either need to rent it again, or go out and buy a copy - and that's where iFlipd offers value to publishers. It has the potential to generate ebook sales elsewhere, and what's more the sharing aspect could generate two sales.
At the same time, iFlipd offers value to readers by letting them sample a book at low cost and low risk, giving them a chance to find ebooks they want to buy. So in addition to generating a small amount of rental revenue, iFlipd could also act as a catalyst for ebook sales. And that is an idea worth considering.
I don't know that publishers should throw their own money at iFlipd, but I would definitely throw a few ebooks their way - much like HC and S&S have signed deals with Oyster and Scribd.
One advantage iFlipd has over Oyster and Scribd is that the latter don't encourage additional sales; they in fact can discourage sales as readers spend more time reading in the Scribd or Oyster apps. iFlipd could well prove to work exactly the opposite.
And what with HarperCollins and S&S both willing to experiment in the subscription ebook market, I think we could soon hear of similar deals with iFlipd.