Publishers Are Unhappy Over Facebook Instant Articles

3129250682_4ea714b95e_bFacebook's Instant Articles has been variously described as the next stage of media consumption or a great threat to news orgs survival. But based on early reports, there's one thing that Instant Articles clearly are not: a money-maker.

Citing persons familiar with the matter, the WSJ reports:

The product is still in its infancy, but publishers including The Washington Post, New York Times and are finding it difficult to extract as much revenue per article from Instant Articles as they do from pages on their own websites, according to people familiar with the situation.

That is because of the guidelines Facebook has laid down on the type and volume of ads publishers are allowed to sell. For example,only one “large banner” ad sized 320 x 250 pixels may be included for every 500 words of content. On their own mobile properties, publishers such as The Washington Post would typically include three or perhaps four of those ads alongside a 500-word article.

Facebook is also restricting the type of ads publishers may place in Instant Articles. It will not allow so-called “rich media” ads, the animated or interactive ads that appear across publishers’ sites.

To put it simply, publishers are upset because Facebook won't let them slather their articles with adverts. (For the record, I have 5 adverts on this page, so I am almost as bad.) In particular, Facebook won't allow the rich media adverts which are simultaneously the most annoying and the most remunerative. (Instead, Facebook wants to sell those rich media adverts themselves.)

But sadly, that is going to change. Michael Reckhow, Facebook’s Instant Articles product manager, told the WSJ that Facebook would allow more adverts per article andad types which were previously verboten. He hasn't shared the specifics, but he did say that: "We’ve made numerous improvements to the advertising capabilities over the past few months and will continue to iterate based on publisher feedback to improve the product".

Officially launched for all users of the Facebook iPhone app last month, Instant Articles lets news publishers and media companies publish content directly to Facebook feeds rather than posting links on Facebook to attract users to their websites.

Twenty publishers are currently participating in the program, which lets them sell adverts against their articles and earn 100% of the revenues, or 70% of the revenues from adverts sold by Facebook.

image by Richard Masoner

About Nate Hoffelder (11461 Articles)
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader: "I've been into reading ebooks since forever, but I only got my first ereader in July 2007. Everything quickly spiraled out of control from there. Before I started this blog in January 2010 I covered ebooks, ebook readers, and digital publishing for about 2 years as a part of MobileRead Forums. It's a great community, and being a member is a joy. But I thought I could make something out of how I covered the news for MobileRead, so I started this blog."

1 Comment on Publishers Are Unhappy Over Facebook Instant Articles

  1. The bigger problem I have with it, is that you can’t see any of the conversations happening on the NYTimes web site, and sometimes, those comments are better than the articles….

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.