Google Ebookstore to sell ebooks from the US Government Printing Office – Um, what?

The GPO announced today that they will be partnering with Google to sell government documents through the Google eBookstore.

The U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO) and Google have entered a partnership to offer the public, for the first time, federal government titles in an e-book format.  The titles will appear on Google’s recently launched Google ebookstore, which can be searched, purchased and read on any connected device with a capable browser.

HAHAHA

These documents are (for the most part) in the public domain. They were created using our tax dollars, and now someone want you to pay for them again! What drugs are they on? And what's worse is that Google will be crippling these ebooks with DRM.  They're public domain, for pete's sake! Google have no right to tell me what I can and cannot do with them.

Okay, I hope you understand that I am laughing because this is one of the more absurd examples of a convenience tax. Basically you're paying so you don't have to search for the titles yourself.  In fact, the press release clearly states that you can get all of the ebooks from the GPO from the Federal Digital System. (At least, you're supposed to be able to get them there; the site is down.)

Nate Hoffelder

View posts by Nate Hoffelder
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader: He's here to chew bubble gum and fix broken websites, and he is all out of bubble gum. He has been blogging about indie authors since 2010 while learning new tech skills at the drop of a hat. He fixes author sites, and shares what he learns on The Digital Reader's blog. In his spare time, he fosters dogs for A Forever Home, a local rescue group.

2 Comments

  1. Richard Adin14 December, 2010

    Many of the GPO publications cost even when orderd directly from the superintendent of documents. Just because they were created with taxpayer dollars doesn’t mean they are free; it only means that thye are not copyrighted, although even there some of the publications are copyrighted. It isn’t as straight forward as you imply.

    Reply
    1. Nate the great14 December, 2010

      But there shouldn’t be a charge for digital content. Reproduction costs are minimal.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to top