B&N fired back at Amazon about the battery life

I just got an email from a pr contact with Barnes and Noble. They know what Amazon did today and they're not taking it lying down.

I was sent the following quote:

With up to two months on a single charge, the All-New NOOK has the longest-battery life in the industry and superior battery performance to Kindle 3. In our side-by-side tests, under the exact same conditions, continuous use of the device resulted in more than two times Kindle’s battery life. While reading at one page a minute, the All-New NOOK battery lasts for 150 hours where the Kindle battery, using the same page-turn rate, lasts for only 56 hours (both with Wi-Fi off). We’ve also done a continuous page turn test and at one page turn per second, the All-New NOOK offers more than 25,000 continuous page turns on a single charge.

-Jamie Iannone, President of Barnes & Noble Digital Products

According to B&N, the new Nook has 3 times the practical battery life of the K3. B&N pretty much called Amazon a liar for manipulating the battery life claims.

Oh, this promises to be so much fun!

Nate Hoffelder

View posts by Nate Hoffelder
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader: He's here to chew bubble gum and fix broken websites, and he is all out of bubble gum. He has been blogging about indie authors since 2010 while learning new tech skills at the drop of a hat. He fixes author sites, and shares what he learns on The Digital Reader's blog. In his spare time, he fosters dogs for A Forever Home, a local rescue group.

16 Comments

  1. karen wester newton25 May, 2011

    It is kind of like watching a playground shoving match, isn’t it?

    Reply
    1. Nate Hoffelder25 May, 2011

      Yes, but it’s more fun!

      Reply
  2. Timothy Wilhoit25 May, 2011

    Let’s get this straight…30 minutes per day x 60 days = 30 hours. They’re saying that a Nook 2 battery can last 25,000 page turns. Are they saying an average user is going to read over 800 pages PER HOUR? These numbers don’t make sense…

    Reply
    1. Timothy Wilhoit25 May, 2011

      Their footnote now reads “Battery life depends on device settings, individual usage, and many other factors. Battery tests are conducted using specific units; actual results may vary.” I don’t see 30 minutes per day usage any more. Interesting.

      Reply
    2. Nate Hoffelder25 May, 2011

      There’s also the standby time, which slowly eats away at the battery life.

      Reply
      1. Timothy Wilhoit25 May, 2011

        A charged battery is a leaky bucket, this is true. Once an impartial reviewer gets a Nook 2, I’m sure he or she will run some comparisons as well. I don’t want to doubt B&N’s veracity, but 25,000 page turns on one battery charge sounds…a bit unlikely. We shall see. 🙂

        Reply
  3. fjtorres25 May, 2011

    Pages turned is going to depend on the type of file being displayed as well as the firmware.
    Plenty of room for hijinks as attested to by the benchmark tweaks of graphic card drivers.
    (For all we know, the nook firmware lets you turn a page without fully rendering it and kindle’s doesn’t. Or they disabled the eink page scrub/black flash to reduce the amount of work done by the nook.)
    Given their earlier bit of puffery I’m not inclined to buy their new claims.
    Fool me once and all that.
    All B&N really needs to do is quote the capacity of their battery and let educated consumers judge.

    Reply
    1. Timothy Wilhoit25 May, 2011

      You’re correct, disabling the e-ink page scrub would make a huge difference. It wouldn’t be a fair comparison though. If true, it won’t be a PR win for B&N…just the opposite.

      Reply
      1. Michael25 May, 2011

        If the Nook 2 could function in real life without the page scrub, and the Kindle can’t, it certainly IS a fair comparison, and a B&N win.

        Reply
        1. Timothy Wilhoit25 May, 2011

          If it turns out the N2 has ghosting issues, I don’t think that would be a win. We’ll find out once the device has been evaluated.

          Reply
  4. Common Sense26 May, 2011

    Whatever. Amazon will be around in 5 or 10 years, can B&N say the same?

    Reply
    1. Mike Cane26 May, 2011

      First laugh of the day! Laughed so hard my hand was shaking and mouse pointer kept missing the Reply link!

      Reply
  5. Nook 2 : l’autonomie de deux mois de lecture qui irrite Amazon | Global-SSII26 May, 2011

    […] amusant, parce que The Digital Reader a obtenu une réponse de BN, qui a très bien vu le tour de passe-passe tenté par Amazon et qui ne […]

    Reply
  6. Kindle ou Nook : Qui a la meilleure autonomie ? | L'actu des ebooks26 May, 2011

    […] et le nouveau Nook permet de tourner plus de 25.000 pages. »Voir le texte original ici.La guerre des communicants de Barnes & Noble contre ceux d’Amazon vient donc de […]

    Reply
  7. Sheryl17 July, 2011

    Page turns doesn’t = book pages. You can make print bigger so that you may do 3-4 page turns per book page. that said, my kindle lasted 3 weeks reading a minimum of 2-3 hours a day and was still NOT dead when I charged it. I read on largest print so that is a lot of page turns. MY NC gets about 5 hours, 1st ed nook gets me about 3 DAYS< total reading time of 6-9 HOURS.

    Reply
  8. […] Amazon felt that they had to respond and they did so in a not terribly clever way. Since they couldn’t actually improve the battery life on the K3, they instead fudged the […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to top
%d bloggers like this: