Amazon Still Beating B&N on Price

Amazon Still Beating B&N on Price eBookstore Have you heard of Booklr? This is a market research firm that is focused entirely on books. Sign up with their service and you can get pricing data on virtually any title published in the US.

Earlier this week they posted an infographic which compared the Top 100 titles in the Nook and Kindle stores. Amazon bet B&n in several ways, including lower average price ($6.48 vs $8.94), s well as having far more titles under $2 (35 vs zero). It's fascinating comparison.

The infographic is after the break.

Amazon Still Beating B&N on Price eBookstore

via eBookNewser

About Nate Hoffelder (9906 Articles)
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader:"I've been into reading ebooks since forever, but I only got my first ereader in July 2007. Everything quickly spiraled out of control from there. Before I started this blog in January 2010 I covered ebooks, ebook readers, and digital publishing for about 2 years as a part of MobileRead Forums. It's a great community, and being a member is a joy. But I thought I could make something out of how I covered the news for MobileRead, so I started this blog."

5 Comments on Amazon Still Beating B&N on Price

  1. While interesting, for a consumer it’s worrisome if Amazon in seeing what B&N gets away with decides to raise prices. Hopefully it reveals that B&N sells a larger percentage of books with fixed publisher pricing and merely exposes the extent that Amazon is venturing into publishing.

  2. B&N doesn’t include any titles less than $2.99 in their top 100 list. It may be a marketing scheme to encourage that price point.

    If you look at the separate PubIt bestselling list, a 99 cent book is #1.

  3. When you compare apples with oranges, as Fbone points out, you get grapefruit results, whcih is what the graph shows. What would Amazon’s average price be if you eliminated the under $2 category? I am always amazed at how easily people are mislead by graphs and charts.

    • Thanks for pointing out the detail, folks; I didn’t know.

      But I’m not sure that it is relevant. The chart compares the top 100 list put out by each store. If B&N wishes to hobble itself by eliminating the cheapest ebooks, that is their problem. I also don’t think B&N’s decision is relevant to this chart because the average user probably won’t know. He will look at the lists and see that Amazon has cheaper prices.

      • No, Nate, the average user will not look at the chart and decide that Amazon is cheaper — unless bloggers keep pushing the apples and oranges comparison. Most users will look for the book title XYZ by She Who Must Be Obeyed and compare the Amazon and B&N price on that book.

        Think of it this way: If all you read are nonfiction histories of medieval times, you won’t care if Amazon sells contemporary romance for less than B&N. It is the distortion of facts by media that raises erroneous information to the level of important fact — it is what we see all the time in political campaigns.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: