Earlier this morning Rich Adin posted about his experiences with B&N, so it was a little surprising to find out that the piss-poor procedure the B&N staff used to resolve his issue came from a company that supposedly topped the CS ranking for the Books category. So I went looking for the answer, and with a minimal amount of effort I foundon the new rankings.
B&N barely made it into the top 10, in fact. They lost to such retail wonders as LLBean, Avon, and Keurig. They also tied with such great retailers like 1800Contacts, Oriental Trading, Scholastic, Vistaprint, and Walmart.
Okay, I'll admit that I'm not being fare to the other retailers, but I'm irked at the way B&N corporate
lied selectively told the truth in the press release. Do you want to know why B&N won the Books category?
It's not that they beat Amazon but because Amazon wasn't even listed as a media seller. Foresee only lists a retailer in a single category and that means Amazon was listed as a mass merchant, even though they sell a heck of a lot of books.
I would ignore the categories. Given how it distorts the appearance of the rankings, I would say that the categories are bad data.