When Surveys Attack

I report on surveys and polls quite frequently on this blog, and as improbable as some of the results might be I usually don't question their validity (unless one poll contradicts another). But today I found an exception.

Yesterday Forbes posted an article on Barnes & Noble's loss last quarter and (ostensibly) an earlier survey on which companies in the ereader market best met consumer expectations. Needless to say, I don't trust Forbes' data, and if you look at their ranking you'll see why:

  1. Amazon
  2. B&N
  3. Apple
  4. Pandigital
  5. Sony
  6. Kobo

I have no problem with the names on the list (aside from the fact that neither Apple nor Pandigital makes ereaders), but I do question the relative positions. Barnes & Noble, in particular, shouldn't rank that high. I've heard far too many complaints about them for that to be valid.

What's more, B&N's own press release earlier this week should knock them off this list. The Nook division of B&N saw a serious drop in profit last quarter, largely due to a significant number of returned ereaders. Why? Because the Nook wasn't actually doing what they wanted.

See, this is why I don't really trust surveys asking whether people are happy with something. You can ask about what they've done and you'll get a reasonably accurate answer.  Or you can ask about what a consumer has bought and you can get the truth.

But if you ask about how they feel about something, well, that's a more nebulous concept. I'm not saying that people don't know if they like something, just that emotional measurements like satisfaction change over time. This is also something that is harder to express in words - even for me, an experienced blogger. Also, I could easily see consumers who liked their Nook ereader when they answered this poll deciding to return it a couple weeks. And that's not a logical contradiction or a criticism of the consumer; opinions can shift like that.

Forbes uses the satisfaction survey to discuss the relative market success of the companies on it. As you can see from B&N's bad quarter, a survey on how someone feels about a company doesn't exactly translate into money in their pocket.

TBH, I'm not sure what this survey is good for. Any ideas?

image by Martin Bamford

Nate Hoffelder

View posts by Nate Hoffelder
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader: He's here to chew bubble gum and fix broken websites, and he is all out of bubble gum. He has been blogging about indie authors since 2010 while learning new tech skills at the drop of a hat. He fixes author sites, and shares what he learns on The Digital Reader's blog. In his spare time, he fosters dogs for A Forever Home, a local rescue group.

7 Comments

  1. Mike Cane22 June, 2012

    Sony was fifth, Kobo sixth. You messed up.

    Reply
    1. Nate Hoffelder22 June, 2012

      What are you talking about?

      Reply
  2. fjtorres22 June, 2012

    The survey asked about companies meeting expectations.
    Nowhere did the survey ask how *high* the expectations were.
    Some companies you deal with, knowing not to expect much–and getting that. 🙂

    Reply
  3. Logan Kennelly22 June, 2012

    I have been extremely satisfied with all the Nook products, and I did not have low expectations. They’ve been successfully driving Amazon to improve their products for years.

    Amazon doesn’t appear to be making any money selling devices. Why should B&N be expected to do better? Because they had a good run for a while?

    And can you confirm that Amazon isn’t getting returned Kindles? Could it be that those that want a reader already have one, and the sales were being driving by gift purchases?

    You are, at the end of the day, talking about the recreational book-reading. There was going to be a ceiling on adoption. I just don’t understand your dislike of B&N as a company…

    Reply
    1. Nate Hoffelder22 June, 2012

      Um, B&N ran 2 BOGO sales these past few months and then announced that they’d gotten a lot of returns. How is that not a sign that many people weren’t satisfied with the Nook?

      Reply
  4. Fbone22 June, 2012

    I thought the returns were unsold inventory from 3rd party retailers.

    Reply
    1. Nate Hoffelder22 June, 2012

      It doesn’t say unsold inventory. It just says returns.

      Unsold inventory being returned might actually be a worse sign. Instead of customers being dissatisfied it would mean retailers don’t think they need to keep as many units in their warehouses in order to have enough to sell to customers.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to top
%d bloggers like this: