In all, the company picks about 100 additions for the 114-year-old dictionary’s annual update, gathering evidence of usage over several years in everything from media to the labels of beer bottles and boxes of frozen food.
… a sneak peak at the Top 25, rounded out by:
Craft beer, ereader, game changer, a new definition for “gassed” as slang for drained of energy, gastropub, geocaching, shovel-ready (a construction site ready for work) and tipping point.
I’ll admit that I was a little surprised that M-W only added the word this year; I would have thought it was a commonly accepted technical term at least 5 years ago, and possibly as long as 10 years ago. And this isn’t a slang term, either; it’s a commonly used word that refers to a well-established concept.
This story got me wondering when the word ereader was first used. I cannot give you an exact date for when it became a common term, but thanks to Google I can tell you when it started showing up in books.
The graph below was generated by the Google Books Ngram Viewer. As you probably know, Google has digitized hundreds of thousands of books. One of the lesser known (but incredibly useful) aspects of all that dirty filthy piracy is the Ngram Viewer. Google fed all the content from all those books through their servers and counted the number of times each word appears. They then shared that data with graphs like the one below.
As you cam see, ebook reader was first heavily used in 2001, and ereader was used saw it’s first uptick in 2006.
Now, the data only runs until 2008, and I cannot find any use of ereader (with the dash) at all, but I think the graph makes my point quite well. M-W should have added the word ereader to their dictionary in 2007, not 2012.
And I have a 2011 edition of one of their dictionaries; neither version of the word ereader is in there – neither with nor without the dash. But the word e-book is in the dictionary, with the dash. Kinda makes you wonder what they think you’re reading that ebook on, doesn’t it?
With that in mind, today’s news becomes more about the long delay before M-W added a common word to their dictionary. What we’re seeing here is that M-W is demonstrating their irrelevance. They’re not reacting nearly as fast as the average user, so there’s little reason to buy their dictionary and use it instead of one of the online alternatives.
P.S. If you want to have a chuckle, think about this. M-W makes a dictionary which you can on the Kindle (9 different ones, actually). Those dictionaries won’t have the word ereader defined, even though you’re holding an ereader. Chew on that.
image by greeblie