EU to Pursue Amazon for Questionable Luxembourg Tax Deal

EU to Pursue Amazon for Questionable Luxembourg Tax Deal Taxes Luxembourg's days as a money-laundering operation for corporate profits are coming to an end.

The WSJ reports that EU regulators are pursuing a case against Amazon. They allege that Amazon's tax arrangements in Luxembourg violate EU law:

The European Commission, the bloc’s top antitrust regulator, opened a formal probe in October to examine whether a tax deal granted to Amazon in Luxembourg amounted to illegal state support for the company.

If those suspicions are confirmed, Luxembourg could be required to recover from Amazon any funds that amount to selective state subsidies, which are illegal under EU law.

The investigation is part of a wider EU clampdown on allegedly illegal tax sweeteners that has also ensnared Apple Inc. in Ireland,Fiat SpA in Luxembourg and Starbucks Corp. in the Netherlands.

The commission has said it is concerned that a 2003 tax deal granted to Amazon in Luxembourg-and still in force-effectively caps the U.S. company’s tax payments in the Grand Duchy.

The WSJ is focusing on Amazon (because clickbait) but this is actually part of a larger effort to crack down on Luxemburg and other EU countries granting special tax arrangements to specific corporations.

EU to Pursue Amazon for Questionable Luxembourg Tax Deal Taxes

And just to be clear, we're not talking about a multi-national corporation using one country's tax laws to shield profits earned elsewhere; the deals in question in Luxembourg are actual sweetheart deals, with special tax rates arranged for specific companies.

Many were arranged with PricewaterhouseCoopers, one of the world's largest accounting firms. PwC acted as an agent for the corporations and secured deals which enabled companies from all over the world, including Amazon, Apple, Ikea, Pepsi, and others, to launder their profits through Luxembourg-based subsidiaries.

And yes, I would call it laundering the profits. I don't have details on Amazon or Apple, but take FedEx, for example:

The records show, for example, that Memphis-based FedEx Corp. set up two Luxembourg affiliates to shuffle earnings from its Mexican, French and Brazilian operations to FedEx affiliates in Hong Kong. Profits moved from Mexico to Luxembourg largely as tax-free dividends. Luxembourg agreed to tax only one quarter of 1 percent of FedEx’s non-dividend income flowing through this arrangement – leaving the remaining 99.75 percent tax-free.

It would be one thing if FedEx were using the written tax code to its advantage, but it's an entirely different case when they get a secret backroom deal just for them.

That, my dear, smacks of corruption.  I simply cannot believe that the tax regulators granted that kind of deal without getting a kickback of some might not come in a monetary form, but there's a kickback in their somewhere.

images by LendingMemoTax Credits

About Nate Hoffelder (10078 Articles)
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader:"I've been into reading ebooks since forever, but I only got my first ereader in July 2007. Everything quickly spiraled out of control from there. Before I started this blog in January 2010 I covered ebooks, ebook readers, and digital publishing for about 2 years as a part of MobileRead Forums. It's a great community, and being a member is a joy. But I thought I could make something out of how I covered the news for MobileRead, so I started this blog."

3 Comments on EU to Pursue Amazon for Questionable Luxembourg Tax Deal

  1. Well, there is corruption and then there is corruption.

    Politicians don’t need under the table kickbacks when they can score political points by bringing in jobs and brag about bringing in extra millions to state coffers that they can then use to buy votes through new “entitlements”. That’s how most corporate sweetheart deals work. The rest usually work on a quid pro quo post facto basis: the old revolving door where public “servants” get their payoff after leaving office, in the form of cushy do-nothing jobs.

  2. What I like best about this article, Nate, is that the true culprit, greed from “many” huge corporations and the folk in this tiny country, enable huge profits from being taxed at even something close to what the individuals in these countries, including ours, have to pay. Thank you.

  3. Thanks for reporting this.

5 Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. UK Readies Punitive 25% "Google Tax" on Diverted Profits ⋆ Ink, Bits, & Pixels
  2. Amazon Hit with EU Antitrust Probe into eBook Contracts | Ink, Bits, & Pixels
  3. Apple, Amazon to be Socked With EU Tax Bill? | The Digital Reader
  4. Apple Gets Year-End 318 Million Euro Tax Bill from Italy; Adobe Plugs Yet Another Flash Security Hole | The Digital Reader
  5. Amazon Ordered to Repay $295 Million in Luxembourg Back Taxes | The Digital Reader

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: