Facebook Says It Will Weed Out BatBoy, Bigfoot Stories From Your News Feed

Facebook Says It Will Weed Out BatBoy, Bigfoot Stories From Your News Feed Web Publishing After taking steps to "protect" users from clickbait, stale news, and like-bait updates in their news feeds, Facebook announced today that they are now going to be filtering out hoaxes.

Facebook has rolled out a new reporting option today which will let users alert FB to false and misleading news stories. If enough people tag a post with the complaint that it's fake, Facebook says that it will get reduced distribution in news deed. Posts that receive lots of reports will also be annotated with a message warning people that many others on Facebook have reported it:

Facebook Says It Will Weed Out BatBoy, Bigfoot Stories From Your News Feed Web Publishing

Facebook says they've adding this reporting option a while ago, after getting numerous requests:

We’ve heard from people that they want to see fewer stories that are hoaxes, or misleading news. Today’s update to News Feed reduces the distribution of posts that people have reported as hoaxes and adds an annotation to posts that have received many of these types of reports to warn others on Facebook. We are not removing stories people report as false and we are not reviewing content and making a determination on its accuracy.

The new reporting option looks like this:

Facebook Says It Will Weed Out BatBoy, Bigfoot Stories From Your News Feed Web Publishing

I don't know about you but I would much prefer to tell someone that the story they linked to is fake rather than have Facebook hide it from me. Sure, whoever shared the link might delete it, but my interest wasn't in getting rid of the content but in interacting with the person who posted it.

Even if the story is bogus, I think it's more fun to tell someone it's bogus than to have the story algorithmicly vanished into the ether.

But on the plus side, this should mean that we're finally going to see the last of "Facebook is going to start charging!" posts, which should vanish along with that bogus copyright notice post which goes around every few months.

So it's not a total loss.

Nate Hoffelder

View posts by Nate Hoffelder
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader: He's here to chew bubble gum and fix broken websites, and he is all out of bubble gum. He has been blogging about indie authors since 2010 while learning new tech skills at the drop of a hat. He fixes author sites, and shares what he learns on The Digital Reader's blog. In his spare time, he fosters dogs for A Forever Home, a local rescue group.

1 Comment

  1. Vonda Z20 January, 2015

    I don’t know if they need to mess with the distribution in the news feed. Just posting the alert that the post may contain false information should encourage anyone who wants to share the post to at least check its validity first, and if it doesn’t check out, most won’t bother to share it in the first place. That is for those posts that are blatantly false and can be checked against snopes.com or other sources.

    Interfering with its distribution can be a gray area though, because I can see people checking this option when they should be checking the “It goes against my views” option, just to discredit an opposing viewpoint in the eyes of others.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to top
%d bloggers like this: