It’s Not Just Apple – Global Tablet Shipments Dipped Last Quarter

It's Not Just Apple - Global Tablet Shipments Dipped Last Quarter e-Reading Hardware Few were surprised when Apple announced disappointing iPad sales last week, but this next bit of news might come as a shock.

New estimates from IDC show that global tablet shipments dropped by 3% last quarter. Only 76.1 million tablets were shipped, down from 78 million shipped in the same quarter of 2013.

Apple of course led the pack with 24 million iPads shipped, and rounding out the top 5 tablet makers were Samsung (11 million), Lenovo (3.7 million), Asus (3 million), and Amazon (1.7 million).

Curiously, four of the top 5 saw a drop in tablet sales last quarter, with Amazon and Apple experiencing the greatest decline. The fivesome collectively shipped about 13 million fewer tablets last quarter than in the previous year, and while most of that shortfall was made up by smaller tablet makers not all of it was.

It's Not Just Apple - Global Tablet Shipments Dipped Last Quarter e-Reading Hardware

The overall market dropped by about two million tablets shipped - in that quarter, at least.

The global tablet shipments for the year, on the other hand, were up by about 10 million tablets. Apple of course led the pack, with Samsung in its usual distant second place and Asus, Lenovo,  and Amazon trailing behind.

It's Not Just Apple - Global Tablet Shipments Dipped Last Quarter e-Reading Hardware

At this point it looks like none of the top 5 released much in the way of interesting hardware last quarter, which in the case of Amazon comes as a surprise.

Amazon launched several new tablets in September, including a 6" model for $99 and a couple kids tablets. I was expecting decent sales, but instead Amazon's tablet sales dropped by around 70%.

It looks like Amazon's decision to release a firmware update for their 2013 models  may have worked against them; a lot of us kept the older model and enjoyed the new OS. Whoops.

Or perhaps Amazon's customers are content with the hardware they have and see no reason to go though a yearly upgrade cycle. Either way, if Amazon's numbers stay this way then it could be a sign that they've reached the limits of their customer base.

Time will tell.

Update: Or not. One important detail I missed and just came back to was that the IDC figures don't include the 6" Fire tablet, because the IDC doesn't see it as a tablet. So basically the IDC numbers are worthless.

 

MacRumors

Nate Hoffelder

View posts by Nate Hoffelder
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader: He's here to chew bubble gum and fix broken websites, and he is all out of bubble gum. He has been blogging about indie authors since 2010 while learning new tech skills at the drop of a hat. He fixes author sites, and shares what he learns on The Digital Reader's blog. In his spare time, he fosters dogs for A Forever Home, a local rescue group.

8 Comments

  1. Fbone2 February, 2015

    I would be interested to know who are the “others” with a combined 43% share. It should be possible to break down those vendors into specifics.

    Reply
    1. I too wish we had a top ten list, especially for the 4th quarter.

      Reply
  2. Fishwall2 February, 2015

    They need to make them break quicker.

    Reply
  3. Willem2 February, 2015

    The word dip does not come to mind when looking at Amazon’s 66% yearly drop. Falling over a cliff is more like it.

    Reply
    1. Considering that Amazon has historically sold most of their tablets in the one quarter, this is pretty bad, yes.

      Reply
    2. Nate Hoffelder3 February, 2015

      Actually, it turns out that I missed a key detail: the IDC figures don’t include the 6″ Fire tablet because it doesn’t meet the IDC’s definition of a tablet.

      Reply
  4. […] a bunch of news sites, including this blog, reported that tablet shipments dipped in the 4th quarter of 2014. While IDC reported that tablet […]

    Reply
  5. […] 4th quarter of 2014 saw global tablet shipments dip by 2 million units, or at least that is what IDC claims. As we learned in February, IDC isn't counting tablets smaller […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to top
%d bloggers like this: