Microsoft Thinks There Aren’t Enough $500 Windows 8 Tablets in the World

They must think that, otherwise we wouldn't be talking about the Surface 3 tablet which launched today.

Microsoft's new "entry-level" Surface 3 tablet runs a full Windows 8 on an Intel Cherry Trail CPU and costs more than other device makers' premium models (Dell, for example).

Microsoft Thinks There Aren't Enough $500 Windows 8 Tablets in the World e-Reading Hardware Microsoft Windows

Basically a trimmed down Surface Pro 3, the Surface 3 has a 10.8" display (1920 x 1280 screen resolution) and ships with 2GB RAM and 64GB storage for $499. You can double the RAM and storage for an additional $100, and if you don't mind waiting Microsoft plans to release models with LTE at some point in the future.

The Surface 3 is smaller and less powerful than the Surface Pro 3, but it has many design details in common. The new tablet has the same 3 position kickstand as on its predeccessor, and it also has the same 3:2 screen geometry which MS first tried on the Surface Pro 3.

Microsoft Thinks There Aren't Enough $500 Windows 8 Tablets in the World e-Reading Hardware Microsoft Windows

The Surface 3 supports Microsoft’s Type Cover keyboard covers, and  the Surface Pen for pressure-sensitive writing or drawing, although of course existing covers won't work with the new screen size.

It's only launching today, so there aren't any detailed hands on reports, but Engadget and TechCrunch each got to spend a few minutes with the Surface 3.  They sounded impressed with the design, and so am I.

This tablet isn't a hugely better deal that its immediate competitors, but it does have points in its favor, including an optional pressure sensitive stylus and (I'm assuming) a bloatware-free version of Windows 8.1.

This is the first Surface tablet I could imagine getting. Unlike the Surface 2, the new tablet runs both Windows 8 software and legacy software. What's more, this tablet has all the style of the Surface 3 Pro without the ridiculously large price tag.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPto6XpRq-U

Liliputing

Nate Hoffelder

View posts by Nate Hoffelder
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader: He's here to chew bubble gum and fix broken websites, and he is all out of bubble gum. He has been blogging about indie authors since 2010 while learning new tech skills at the drop of a hat. He fixes author sites, and shares what he learns on The Digital Reader's blog. In his spare time, he fosters dogs for A Forever Home, a local rescue group.

14 Comments

  1. Paul Biba31 March, 2015

    Minor correction: the kickstand on the Surface Pro 3 is infinitely adjustable, not 3 position (that was on the Surface 2).

    Reply
    1. Nate Hoffelder31 March, 2015

      Thanks!

      Reply
  2. jjj31 March, 2015

    You can easily buy better convertibles for a lot less.

    Reply
    1. Nate Hoffelder31 March, 2015

      Better? There are cheaper ones, yes, but are those other devices as powerful?

      Reply
      1. jjj31 March, 2015

        It’s Atom based, new Atom but Atom.

        Reply
      2. jjj31 March, 2015

        Sorry for the comment spam but w/o editing i can’t do much about it.
        The SoC seems to be Atom x7-Z8700 , so sure a new 14nm part but don’t expect much. http://ark.intel.com/products/85475/Intel-Atom-x7-Z8700-Processor-2M-Cache-up-to-2_40-GHz
        The only benchmark i’ve spotted for it is http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/compare/2217419?baseline=1898242
        Yeah i am being mean and compared it with the Galaxy S6 to make it look bad and that benchmark could be on early software and maybe final perf is better ( or even a lot better) but i just don’t have any other numbers for it at this point.

        Reply
    2. jjj31 March, 2015

      In fact if you factor in the 130$ price tag for the keyboard (leading to 630$ total), you can find alternatives at half the price .

      Reply
  3. trytr31 March, 2015

    This device has pretty nice specs but is too expensive, especially here (the small model has been announced for 599 EUR, the larger one for 719 EUR, though including VAT). Looks like waiting for the second-hand market would be the most reasonable thing to do. Good to see tech getting better, though. We’ll eventually get rid of noisy fans everywhere, I hope.

    Reply
  4. Lynne Connolly31 March, 2015

    When the Surface 3 Pro came out, manufacturers heavily discounted the Surface Pro 2. That’s when I got one for about the same price the new Surface is selling for. I got 8 gb of RAM, an i5 processor and 256 gb of storage. While I love the improvements they brought in with the Surface 3, it wasn’t compelling enough for me to trade in my Pro 2.
    Before that I had an Asus Book T100. But it was never enough, and it wasn’t particularly fun to work on. The keyboard was lovely, but it was all so – plasticky. Obviously slower, too. I’d call it adequate. It’s a great little budget tablet combo, if you don’t expect too much.
    The Surface Pro 2 is solidly built, and a pleasure to handle. It does what I need it to do. But I’d definitely consider the new Surface 3 if I didn’t have the Pro 2.

    Reply
  5. fjtorres31 March, 2015

    The case is magnesium and, lets face it, the model to get is the up-sell 4GB/128 model at $599. Most of the competition runs 2/32 or 2/64 but for actual productivity Tablets you really want the 4GB RAM.
    For media consumption and casual gaming, yes, you’re better off with something like the $250 ASUS Transformer and sticking in a 64Gb SD card. (Or some generic Droid or a Fire) but you don’t get the pen and you don’t get the RAM and you don’t get that sweet casing.

    It’s a $100 more than I expected/hope but unless the OEMs step up their game, the Surface 3 (4/128)looks to be my next toy. Now to see if the LTE-ready option is priced reasonably for my limited uses.

    Reply
    1. Nate Hoffelder31 March, 2015

      I’d want 8GB, actually.

      I see 2GB RAM as being enough for an accessory but not a work computer. (Although a Chromebook could prove me wrong; I don’t know how well it manages memory.)

      Reply
      1. fjtorres31 March, 2015

        Me, too. But the price would ballon (at least another $100, maybe 2) and at that point I might as well go for the Surface Pro.

        What I like is the balance of size, features, and price.
        (The memory bandwidth beats the other Atom processors by a lot, btw.)

        I’m not going to pre-order or anything, just yet, to see if ASUS cooks up a newer transformer or if somebody else does something interesting with those new atoms but the thing charges off USB. That is plenty cool. And it has more than one port, too. . 🙂

        Reply
  6. Paul31 March, 2015

    Isn’t the main point that Windows RT is dead with this release? As its running on an atom chip? Or am I mistaken?

    Reply
    1. Nate Hoffelder31 March, 2015

      WinRT is dead, yes.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to top
%d bloggers like this: