Amazon Detractors Invited to Debate Its Monopolistic Bookselling on Twitter, But None Show Up

Amazon Detractors Invited to Debate Its Monopolistic Bookselling on Twitter, But None Show Up Conferences & Trade shows Publishing The Authors Guild Sometime they’ll give a war and nobody will come, as the line from the poem goes, and that almost sums up what we saw on Twitter today.

Earlier today LitChat held a TwitterChat on the #LitChat tag, and invited Authors United and its allies (ABA, The Authors Guild, the AAR) to discuss Au's recent announcement that it was sending a letter to the US Dept of Justice. (That letter has been covered and rehashed extensively elsewhere, so I won't repeat it here.)

Alas, no one from Authors United or its allies showed up for the debate, which is unfortunate because the indie viewpoint was well-represented. Passive Guy caught wind of the event and announced it on The Passive Voice blog this morning about four hours before the debate. That gave the usual crew plenty of time to clear a space in our schedules, make some popcorn, and sharpen our wits.

Ably moderated by Judah Freed, the resulting 69-minute debate (it ran long) was as entertaining as it was one-sided. An ABA rep did speak up briefly and state that they were monitoring the discussion, but the active debaters were so clustered on one side of ...

Well, I would not normally describe such a diverse group of individuals as a single side in any debate, but almost all the participants in today's debate showed up with the intent of arguing against Authors United. You can blame the polarizing effect of Authors United for that.

While there were several authors who took the position of AU, the discussion was in fact so one-sided that Hugh Howey decided to play Devil's Advocate and argue the other side. This led to unfortunate situations where a few participants who were encountering Howey for the first time took his tweets seriously.

All in all, it was an entertaining hour. If you missed it, LitChat archived the discussion in this PDF.

image by Liberal Democrats

Nate Hoffelder

View posts by Nate Hoffelder
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader: He's here to chew bubble gum and fix broken websites, and he is all out of bubble gum. He has been blogging about indie authors since 2010 while learning new tech skills at the drop of a hat. He fixes author sites, and shares what he learns on The Digital Reader's blog. In his spare time, he fosters dogs for A Forever Home, a local rescue group.

12 Comments

  1. fjtorres22 July, 2015

    The only “conversation” the AU propaganda gang is interested in is one with fellow amazon haters, like the one Preston had last week at Salon.

    Reply
    1. Tim Wilhoit22 July, 2015

      From Nate’s post: “Alas, no one from Authors United or its allies showed up for the debate, which is unfortunate because the indie viewpoint was well-represented.” Yeah, that was enough reason for pro-Cartel folks to stay the H away. I’m sure ‘is Lordship, D. Preston of Outhouse, would prefer not debating Howey or Konrath. I imagine he’s as courageous as Sir Robin. 😉

      Reply
      1. Nate Hoffelder22 July, 2015

        TBH I’m not sure if they avoided it or just didn’t get enough advance notice. In all fairness, they should have been invited a month ahead of time.

        LitChat’s post only went live yesterday. That’s just not enough time.

        Reply
        1. Chris Meadows22 July, 2015

          You could say that it’s payback for that time they had Passive Guy come out to New York City so they could all gang up on him.

          Reply
        2. Timothy Wilhoit22 July, 2015

          Even if he had 6 months notice…Preston likes the visuals(writing hovel pose!) and the catchy sound bites. A Twitter chat doesn’t avail itself to visuals or sound bites (not effectively, anyway.) He wouldn’t have done nearly as well, IMHO.

          Since it was short notice, that’s a plausible excuse, I suppose. Nah, I ain’t buying it.

          Reply
  2. Suzan Harden22 July, 2015

    Sounds like I made the better choice to write at a café after dropping the niece off for work. That Hugh felt the need to play Devil’s Advocate because the even was so one-sided is so very sad.

    Reply
  3. David Gaughran23 July, 2015

    Maybe they are still figuring out how to set up Twitter accounts?

    More seriously, I haven’t seen anyone from Preston’s camp show the slightest inclination towards actually debating any of these issues. They will only talk to journalist-stenographers who will repeat their claims uncritically and not subject them to any scrutiny whatsoever.

    Propaganda, in other words.

    Reply
  4. Juli Monroe23 July, 2015

    Thanks for linking to the roundup. I saw the post on Passive Voice but then forgot about it when I was editing my current novel draft. I think the hour was better spent editing. 🙂

    Reply
    1. Nate Hoffelder23 July, 2015

      I divided my time between general Twitter, catching up on my feeds, that debate, and writing. The debate did not merit our full attention, no.

      Reply
  5. Bob Mayer23 July, 2015

    Most bestselling authors disdain social media as they don’t need it. Midlisters who are trad published need it, but are afraid of taking a position because they fear what their agent, editor, publisher etc. will do.

    Reply
  6. […] Amazon Detractors Invited to Debate Its Monopolistic Bookselling on Twitter, But None Show Up […]

    Reply
  7. […] one at The Authors Guild or the American Bookseller's Association was able to find an hour in their busy schedules to publicly debate their recent calls for an antitrust investigation into […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to top
%d bloggers like this: