Cengage, McGraw-Hill, and Pearson File Suit Against Textbook Importer

Cengage, McGraw-Hill, and Pearson File Suit Against Textbook Importer Intellectual Property Lawsuit Three major textbook publishers filed a lawsuit this week against a a textbook importer by the name of Information Recyclers, and the three fellows accused of running it. The lawsuit, Cengage Learning et al v Hunting et al, was filed on Tuesday in the US District court of Massachusetts.

The 14-page filing accuses the three men of importing and selling pirated counterfeit copies of textbooks whose copyrights belong to the three publishers. The publishers allege that the imported textbooks were unauthorized reproductions which violate the publishers trademarks and copyrights.

If this case sounds familiar, you're not alone. The filing immediately reminded me of Kirtsaeng v Wiley, the landmark US Supreme Court ruling that said that legally produced textbooks could be imported with or without the approval of the original publisher.

Originally filed in 2008 against Supap Kirtsaeng, then a college student, Kirtsaeng v Wiley settled a key detail of the first sale doctrine. Kirtsaeng was sued for importing and reselling cheaply produced foreign editions of textbooks belonging to Wiley. The publisher argued that this violated US copyright law, and won the case at both the district and appellate level, but ultimately the US Supreme Court ruled that Kirtsaeng had the legal right to resell textbooks which had been produced legally.

...

(the rest of this post has been eaten by a wordpress bug, sorry)

 

About Nate Hoffelder (9946 Articles)
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader:He's here to chew bubble gum and fix broken websites, and he is all out of bubble gum. He has been blogging about indie authors since 2010 while learning new tech skills at the drop of a hat. He fixes author sites, and shares what he learns on The Digital Reader's blog. In his spare time, he fosters dogs for A Forever Home, a local rescue group.

1 Comment on Cengage, McGraw-Hill, and Pearson File Suit Against Textbook Importer

  1. If the allegations against Information Recyclers (from the complaint document) are accurate, the books are inferior copies of the plaintiff’s. If they weren’t legally produced, this becomes a lawsuit like Basic Books v. Kinko’s Graphics. IR will lose, if it is. (As an aside, “Information Recyclers” does have a pirate-y ring to it.)

    The books in the Wiley case were legally produced in the country of origin, IIRC. I would have to refresh my memory, it’s been a while since I’ve read through that one.

2 Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Top 5 Publishing News Stories 8/10-8/14 - Publishing Trendsetter
  2. Hack Education Weekly News | Co-Opt-Ed

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Tweet14
Share3
+12
Pin
Share
19 Shares
%d bloggers like this: