In fact, one noteworthy and recent example of mealy-mouthed language would have to be the recent news coverage of a US military attack on an Afghan hospital, which was variously reported as:
- Air Attacks Kill at Least 19 at Afghanistan Hospital; US Investigating
- US Officials Investigate Airstrike in Afghanistan That Killed at Least 19 at Doctors Without Borders Hospital
- Airstrike Hits Hospital in Afghanistan, Killing at Least 9
And now McSweeney's is going to show us how to pull the same trick ourselves.
There's a new post on McSweeney's today that shows how you can rewrite a straightforward sentence written in the active voice to one written in the passive voice, and avoid saying anything important.
Starting with the sentence we all typed in keyboarding class (The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog), McSweeney's takes us step by step through the various stages of non-responsibility, leading to a sentence that only has the vaguest relation to the event it describes:
Speed was involved in a jumping-related incident while a fox was brown.
You really have to read the article to get the greatest benefit; it's almost a self-contained lesson in the structure of the English language and in writing to obfuscate.
I picked up a couple pointers myself. And I'll be honest; I've written sentences like that. Sometimes I do it to avoid the truth, but other times I use the passive voice just for my own amusement - just to see how far I can get and still write an accurate report.
And even if you're not a writer, you should still go read it. This article will inoculate you against non-inflammatory writing like the headlines mentioned above, leaving you a better-informed reader with the ability to recognize and call BS when a news report is trying to avoid calling a spade a spade.
image by Tambako the Jaguar