German Publisher Axel Springer Bans Ad-Blocking Users from Bild Website

Stymied by yet another court ruling which declared ad blocking to be legal, Axel Springer has entered a pointless arms race with ad blockers. And to make things even worse, the publisher has lost the first campaign.

PC World, The Stack, and other sites report that Axel Springer is now preventing ad block users from visiting, its news site. Starting Tuesday, any visitors who are using a browser extension to block adverts will be shown this warning message instead of the website:

bild ad blocker

The message prompts visitors to either disable the ad block extension or subscribe to  Bild for 3 euros per month. Users are promised faster loading articles and as much as 90% fewer adverts.

Yes, Axel Springer is following in the footsteps of the Washington Post and a handful of other publishers that are refusing to let any of the 200 million or so ad block users visit their websites. Most importantly, Axel Springer is cutting itself an estimated 20 million Germans and Austrians (out of around 90 million people) who block adverts in their web browsers.

Or rather, that is what Axel Springer is trying to accomplish; whether they will succeed is another matter. The block can be readily circumvented simply by using an anti-tracking extensions like NoScript or Privacy Badger.

I installed a Chrome extension called ScriptBlock, and was able to visit the site with no problems. (I then disabled the extension because it was messing up all the scripts on all the other sites I visit, but that is less a problem with the idea than a sign I need to find a better tool for the job. Suggestions?)

Axel Springer is getting in to an arms race with its readers, and it has already lost the first round. Let’s hope it figures out the futility of fighting with readers before it loses the war.

On the other hand, that would require new ways of thought, or experimenting with new business models, and Axel Springer has shown that it might not be able to pull that off.

In a statement on the Axel Springer blog, a spokesperson for the company said that journalism must be financed by the “two known revenue pillars” (advertising or sales).

The publisher would rather fight for what it has now rather than find a new way to fund itself, and that means that will likely not survive the rise of ad blocking.

Nate Hoffelder

View posts by Nate Hoffelder
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader. He has been blogging about indie authors since 2010 while learning new tech skills weekly. He fixes author sites, and shares what he learns on The Digital Reader's blog. In his spare time, he fosters dogs for A Forever Home, a local rescue group.


  1. drt13 October, 2015

    LOL, seeing die for whatever reason would be hilarious. BILD is the number one German yellow press publication. There is no journalism here that would need to be financed. Nothing of value would be lost, if all of a sudden shut down. What can probably be seen right now is their experimenting with what works and what doesn’t. The brand is very profitable and Axel Springer, from what I’ve heard, definitely successful with its online platforms. I seriously doubt, that there’s lack of new thought or negligence of experimenting with new business models at Axel Springer of all publishers.

  2. 113 October, 2015

    I think they are doing an even worse job than you think. I just tried disabling Easylist and installing Easylist Germany.
    The site now works…

  3. 113 October, 2015

    Or you can keep Easylist and just add “||–15.20/bild/built/Konfig/js/packages/*” as a custom filter.

    1. Nate Hoffelder13 October, 2015

      Thaks, 1!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to top