Mein Kampf Shortages Highlight Problems With Academic Publishing

mein kampfBoth the works of Anne Frank and Adolf Hitler entered the public domain in much of Europe this year, and yet only one is widely available.

Writing over at The Conversation, Maaken Umbach informs us that the new critical edition of Hitler’s Mein Kampf is in short supply. While older editions are available on the Internet Archive and in ebookstores, the edition that everyone wants to buy is rarer than hen’s teeth:

This has obviously caused some anxiety and, in an attempt to steer the way the German public engages with the text, the Institute for Contemporary History in Munich decided to launch a critical scholarly edition. It includes a long introduction and countless footnotes that point out the many flaws in Hitler’s arguments. As the editors have explained, their main aim was to foreground “what we can counterpose to Hitler’s innumerable assertions, lies and expressions of intent”.

The edition sold out before it even appeared on the shelves of bookstores. Many readers, including me, are still waiting for their copies. It seems that 15,000 advance orders were placed for a print run of just 4,000. The printers were overwhelmed and left unable to fulfil the requests of many frustrated customers.

It has also created a thriving black market. Copies are being traded at extortionate prices, well above the official €59.

So there’s a critical shortage of the two volume, 2,000-page print edition, and for some reason I don’t understand, there’s no ebook edition (not even on, where the print copies are going for 349 euros).

And that has me scratching my head.


Many in academic publishing have said that academic print publishing is dying, and it’s taking college bookstores with it to the grave (although I do know at least one indie author who would disagree). It’s gotten so bad that some university presses, including Ohio State University Press, Amherst College Press, ANU Press, Penn State Romance Studies, and De Gruyter Open, are giving up on the idea of selling their books and are instead releasing at least some titles under a license where the ebook is free to download.

Given that academic presses exist to publish works that have little market value, that is a sensible move (it supports the presses’ core goal of disseminating knowledge).

But apparently the Institute doesn’t see it that way. They’d rather leave academics scrambling than get with the modern times.

image via Reuters

Nate Hoffelder

View posts by Nate Hoffelder
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader. He has been blogging about indie authors since 2010 while learning new tech skills weekly. He fixes author sites, and shares what he learns on The Digital Reader's blog. In his spare time, he fosters dogs for A Forever Home, a local rescue group.


  1. TheSFReader25 January, 2016

    A few reasons (not necessarily good ones) :
    – a book heavy (“countless”) on footnotes book, which would cost way more to (correctly) format as an ebook.
    – a wish to make sure derived copies would keep the critical content, and would show the critical content the “approved” way…

  2. Seth W.25 January, 2016

    I’m left with the question after reading the article. Why couldn’t you find editions on Amazon? I just checked and there are lots. I even own the $9.99 Michael Ford edition where I think its just an amazing translation.

    1. Nate Hoffelder25 January, 2016

      I mentioned in the second paragraph that older editions are available in bookstores, yes.

      But the new edition, the one which scholars are obsessed with, is not available in the Kindle Store.

  3. Maiken Umbach26 January, 2016

    I agree a digital version of the new, critical edition would be very welcome, although the printers are now rapidly producing additional hard copies. The counter-argument is “bittiness”: digitised versions of the text, and even more numerous short extracts from it, are widely available online. Part of the point of the critical edition is to treat the text in its entirety, and “frame” it with a substantive commentary, through the introduction and the many footnotes. Presumably, the editors fear that a digital version would simply replicate the old habit of cherry-picking passages, and thereby obscure the ideological context of this problematic book.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to top