ABA Expands Anti-Amazon FUD Campaign

ABA Expands Anti-Amazon FUD Campaign ABA Amazon Publishing The Rockies may crumble, Gibraltar may tumble. They're only made of clay, but the ABA's hostility towards Amazon is here to stay.

The American Bookseller Association continued its anti-Amazon propaganda efforts this week with a new letter writing campaign:

This week, the American Booksellers Association launched a national advocacy campaign with letters urging the U.S. Congress, the 50 state attorneys general, and the 50 state governors to investigate Amazon for violations of antitrust laws.

In the letters, ABA CEO Oren Teicher wrote that the association strongly believes that “Amazon’s abuse of its dominance and its growing monopolization have had a negative impact on free expression and the health of America’s book industry, including a chilling effect on the diversity of, and access to, books and information.”

In conjunction with the antitrust campaign, ABA launched its Antitrust Action Kit, which provides booksellers with state-specific letters that they can adapt and send to both their state and federal lawmakers as well as other key officials.

The ABA's past propaganda efforts include co-signing Authors United's letter to the DOJ which asked for Amazon to be investigated for antitrust violations, and publishing an "interview" of Mary Rasenberger in support of same.

Given that Amazon's revenues have increased every quarter since then, it's obvious that those earlier attempts to sway public opinion either fell on deaf ears or were never noticed at all. Something tells me that this letter writing campaign will be similarly successful.

If you head on over to The Passive Voice, you can read PG's 529-word rebuttal of the legal arguments the ABA makes in the letters. Personally, I feel that was a waste of time and self-defeating.

The ABA's goal here is not to get Amazon investigated but to make Amazon look evil/bad/villainous. They want us talking about antitrust, and to debate them on that point is to let them win the first round by framing the discussion.

The best way to counter their objective is to label this campaign for what it is, FUD, and end the discussion there. This denies the ABA its goal, and saves our energies for more useful purposes.

image by nordique

Nate Hoffelder

View posts by Nate Hoffelder
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader: He's here to chew bubble gum and fix broken websites, and he is all out of bubble gum. He has been blogging about indie authors since 2010 while learning new tech skills at the drop of a hat. He fixes author sites, and shares what he learns on The Digital Reader's blog. In his spare time, he fosters dogs for A Forever Home, a local rescue group.

1 Comment

  1. fjtorres4 March, 2016

    All anybody needs to know is that in the 90’s the ABA sued the big publishers on antitrust and won a settlement. Then they sued the big retailers and lost big.

    If they really thought Amazon was violating the law they would have already sued. They’re just trying to draw politicians into giving them for free what they haven’t earned in the marketplace.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to top
%d bloggers like this: