How many times has this happened to you: you buy a print book, you start to read it, you go on a trip, you forget to take the book, you find the e-book version online, and you chafe at having to pay full price for another version of something you already have?
The music industry has largely solved this problem; the question is why the book publishing industry hasn’t. Many CD and vinyl albums available on Amazon come with free MP3 versions of the music that you can play on Amazon’s Cloud Player or download to your own device. Indie retailer Bandcamp gives you access to downloads in multiple formats as well as on-demand streaming when you buy a CD or vinyl album.
The news last week that the Vancouver-based startup Shelfie (formerly BitLit) ceased operations has brought the so-called P+E (print plus ebook) bundling problem into focus. Shelfie was an independent service that enabled users to get ebook versions of their print books at a discount, or in some cases, for free.
Shelfie’s technology was clever and slick. You took a picture of the books on your shelves with the Shelfie app on your phone or tablet (a “shelfie,” get it?). Shelfie identified at least some of the books, just as wine apps like Vivino and Delectable identify wines when you take pictures of the labels. For each title in Shelfie’s catalog, it offered you a deal on the ebook (and/or the audiobook). You could obtain the ebook through Shelfie’s own store. About 30% of ebooks were free. Some ebooks were DRM-free; some used the Adobe DRM, which is compatible with various reading apps (including Adobe Digital Editions, BlueFire Reader, Kobo, and Nook) that run on a wide variety of devices.
There were four flaws in Shelfie’s scheme that, taken together, turned out to be fatal. First, in order to claim your discounted or free ebook, you had to sign your name on the copyright page of the print book, then use the app to take a picture of that and send it in. This, of course, helped ensure that multiple people couldn’t use the same print book to get a cheap/free ebook. But it also was a hassle and lowered the value of your print book if you were to resell it or donate it to a library.
The second flaw was that Shelfie’s catalog lacked titles from major publishers. Shelfie had built a fairly large catalog but only got one of the “big five” to license material: HarperCollins, the most adventurous of the majors in trying new digital business models. A Shelfie chart from December 2015 shows that about 16% of “books on an ‘average’ shelf  are from publishers that [Shelfie] signed a deal with” for ebooks. Note that this is “from publishers that [Shelfie] made a deal with,” not “titles actually available as ebooks in Shelfie’s catalog.” Some publishers only licensed selected titles to Shelfie. (When I tried Shelfie in that same timeframe, it recognized most of my books correctly, but the percentage of my titles available as ebooks was more like 10-12%.)
Third, Shelfie’s model did not exactly encourage repeat traffic. You’d take a shelfie, find that it only had deals available on a small percentage of your books, maybe take advantage of a couple, and move on. You’d get occasional emails from the company saying that they’ve added more publishers; maybe you’d try again sometime. You certainly wouldn’t make Shelfie a regular destination for your ebook buying or catalog management, despite the social features built into the app.
Finally, the DRM-protected ebooks couldn’t be read on Kindle devices. (OK, they could be read on Kindle Fires if you knew how to bypass the Amazon app store and install an Adobe-compatible reader.)
But that’s not really the company’s fault. Shelfie worked tirelessly to sign publisher and distributor deals, and to make the app as user-friendly as possible. It took the P+E experience as far as it could go on its own. Just as various independent “cloud music sync” startups (such as Audiogalaxy, DoubleTwist, and Catch Media) collapsed when major music retailers started offering the feature, Shelfie’s real problem was that it wasn’t — or wasn’t part of — a major ebook retailer.
Compare the Shelfie experience with that of Amazon’s Kindle MatchBook program, which it started in September 2013… just a few months after Shelfie’s original launch as BitLit. With Kindle MatchBook, you can buy ebook versions of print books you bought on Amazon.com for $2.99 or less, including eligible titles bought before the program started (going back to Amazon.com’s original launch in 1995). Amazon has a record of each purchase, so there’s no need to take pictures of your print books, sign and photograph the copyright page, or even go to a separate app. You just click to purchase the ebook, and it appears in your Kindle library. A much smoother user experience than Shelfie could offer.
Yet putting aside the fact that Kindle MatchBook ebooks can only be read on Kindle devices or apps, the problem with Kindle MatchBook, once again, is the catalog. Amazon built the catalog up to about 74,000 titles as it launched the program (compared to Shelfie’s 400,000), and it hasn’t grown since then. That’s less than 2% of the number of print book titles Amazon sells that are also available as ebooks (by my estimate). The only major trade publisher material on Kindle MatchBook is from HarperCollins (once again) and Macmillan’s Tor SF/fantasy imprint; the vast majority of the titles are either from indie publishers or Amazon’s own imprints such as Montlake Romance.
Nowadays, Amazon says nothing about the size of the catalog and doesn’t promote MatchBook anymore: there’s no “Kindle MatchBook Eligible” checkbox in Amazon’s book search, and the only way to find out if a book is MatchBook-eligible is to find the far-from-obvious Kindle MatchBook landing page and click the button to get a list of the print books that you already bought which are eligible.
Now compare that with Amazon’s AutoRip program for free MP3s with CD or LP purchases. Amazon promotes AutoRip actively. Like MatchBook, it’s retroactive for eligible CDs and LPs purchased back to 1998. It covers about 240,000 CD and LP titles, which is 7% of the total number of CD and LP titles available on Amazon (again, my estimate) and probably a much higher percentage of CD and LP titles that are also available separately as MP3s. All of the major labels participate in AutoRip. Of Amazon’s current top 20 best-selling CDs, all but one are AutoRip-eligible.
Apart from Amazon, P+E bundling deals are few and far between. The most common source is tech publishers like O’Reilly, which offers bundles for just a few dollars more than the print or ebook prices, only on selected titles (such as, umm, this one). To underscore publishers’ lack of enthusiasm for P+E, even former O’Reilly executive Joe Wikert — known as a book publishing innovator — dismissed the idea as something that “will only help erode the perceived value of ebooks.”
Why is this the case? Certainly part of it is consumers’ preferences for physical vs. digital products, which is currently 78% to 22% in books and almost exactly the opposite in music. But the root cause is simply that it’s hard for consumers to digitize print books themselves.
Music, even vinyl LPs, is much easier for users to digitize than print books. Apple brought this issue to the fore (for CDs) with its “Rip, Mix, Burn” ad campaign back in 2001, which sent the music industry into apoplexy and raised the question of whether creating MP3s of your CDs (or vinyl) for personal use was legal. The answer in Canada and the EU is yes. In the United States, the RIAA allows that ripping CDs for your own personal use “won’t usually raise concerns“, and lawsuits such as EMI v. MP3Tunes established the legality of storing those MP3s on your personal cloud storage, while in parallel, the major music retailers started offering cloud sync services (with or without licenses from record companies). Cloud sync for music became a standard feature for major digital music retailers around 2011.
Meanwhile, although there are services that will digitize your books for you, they require you to ship the book to them, then they cut the spine off and throw the paper copy away. There’s no technology equivalent to PC CD drives, USB turntables, iTunes, or Audacity for books. Accordingly, the publishing industry has only objected legally to book digitization on a large scale, such as in the cases against Google and HathiTrust, and in a previous generation, against Kinko’s copy shops (now Fedex Office) over textbook materials.
Another factor that holds back P+E bundling is the walled gardens that retailers have built using DRM and other mechanisms. The kind of user-friendly P+E that Amazon offers for books is only possible because Amazon can use records of purchases to establish book ownership — and it’s only worth offering because Amazon is such a large book retailer. Kindle MatchBook doesn’t apply to books you didn’t buy on Amazon, and the ebooks that you get through the program aren’t readable outside of the Kindle ecosystem. P+E bundling is thus yet another way for a retailer to achieve consumer lock-in.
The movie industry already thought about this issue and came up with UltraViolet as a solution. Hollywood studios wanted to promote competition among video services by diminishing their ability to lock consumers into their platforms. UltraViolet achieved this not by eliminating DRM (which all Hollywood consumer digital video products use in some form) but through a DRM interoperability scheme. For example, if you bought an UltraViolet-approved movie from one retailer (say, on DVD or Blu-ray), then you can get it as a digital download or stream from the same or another UltraViolet-participating retailer. The system requires that all products use one of several approved DRMs, and the rights locker stores a decryption key that any UltraViolet-approved DRM can use.
Yet UltraViolet hasn’t been a great success, in part because the diminished lock-in opportunities don’t make it attractive to retailers. The only big-name service that supports it is Walmart’s VUDU. Eliminating DRM altogether might make it logistically easier and cheaper for retailers to offer P+E bundling (and would be good for users, of course) but it would also reduce retailer incentives.
As for Shelfie, the obvious exit path for the company was to be acquired by a major book retailer. Why this didn’t happen is a mystery. Barnes & Noble leaps to mind: it could have offered an equivalent to Kindle MatchBook for books purchased at its many bookstores over a long period of time, and extended it via the Shelfie technology to books that users didn’t buy there. This would have been a real competitive advantage over Amazon.
It’s possible that Shelfie approached B&N and couldn’t reach agreement on terms, but it’s just as possible that B&N didn’t see enough opportunity in offering a feature that publishers wouldn’t support. The cost and effort for consumers to digitize their own books is a barrier that seems insurmountable. As long as there’s no “Rip, Mix, Burn” for books, P+E has a limited future.
reposted under a CC license from Copyright & Technology
image by Pen Waggener