Nate Hoffelder

View posts by Nate Hoffelder
Nate Hoffelder is the founder of The Digital Reader. He has been blogging about indie authors since 2010 while learning new tech skills weekly. He fixes author sites, and shares what he learns on The Digital Reader's blog. In his spare time, he fosters dogs for A Forever Home, a local rescue group.


  1. Frank31 October, 2017

    I prefer The Verge

    Nate, your LA Times and The Guardian links are for the first Oasis. It does not appear like those two have posted a review yet.

    1. Nate Hoffelder31 October, 2017

      yes, sorry, I didn’t check the dates carefully enough.

  2. Burton31 October, 2017

    The HuffPost review is for the 2016 version.

    1. Nate Hoffelder31 October, 2017

      thank you

      this is not one of my shining moments

  3. tired1 November, 2017

    Tom’s Guide has by far the best review. It provided depth, detail, tests and conclusions free of bias. Only problem with it is that they made it sound like Oasis improved the auto-brightness in this model, when it introduced it. Maybe they meant the auto-brightness is better than it was on the Voyage, but they said older Oasis model instead.

    It is a shame that this new Kindle model didn’t come with usb-c, the new standard.

    1. Scott1 November, 2017

      If it had come with USB-C, there would be mass complaints from people that they didn’t use Micro-USB.

  4. Scott1 November, 2017

    The CNN review is the worst. They spend almost the entire (short) review complaining that you can’t read underwater with the Oasis, because weird things happen. Then they not in an update that the Oasis is not designed to be used underwater.

Leave a Reply

Scroll to top