Morning Coffee – 16 April 2018

Morning Coffee - 16 April 2018 Morning Coffee

Here are a few stories to read this Monday morning.

  1. Publishers Weekly Includes Two Vanity Publishers in its List of Fast-Growing Independent Presses (Writer Beware
  2. The perfect crimes: why thrillers are leaving other books for dead (Guardian
  3. Why American Students Haven't Gotten Better at Reading in 20 Years (The Atlantic
  4. How Beethoven’s ‘mistake’ became one of our most famous tunes (The Conversation
  5. The Billion-Dollar Romance Fiction Industry Has A Diversity Problem (NPR
  6. 'You are what you read' book on constructive journalism surpasses its crowdfunding target (
About Nate Hoffelder (10079 Articles)
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader:"I've been into reading ebooks since forever, but I only got my first ereader in July 2007. Everything quickly spiraled out of control from there. Before I started this blog in January 2010 I covered ebooks, ebook readers, and digital publishing for about 2 years as a part of MobileRead Forums. It's a great community, and being a member is a joy. But I thought I could make something out of how I covered the news for MobileRead, so I started this blog."

6 Comments on Morning Coffee – 16 April 2018

  1. Nate, your recent post about “with-talk-to-books-google-wants-to-replace-english-lit-professors” does not display properly.

  2. Your other pages work fine, but the “Talk to Books” article I see:

    **deleted a lot of stuff**

  3. RE: the question in the article, “Seriously, PW? Why do you keep doing this?”

    Probably because the publishers paid for ads, so PW gives them a nod. PW, another thing that’s just a joke.

  4. RE: “Why American Students Haven’t Gotten Better at Reading in 20 Years”

    One thing to consider is that they haven’t gotten worse, so considering the tyranny of technology that has arisen in that time, not losing ground should maybe be seen as a small marvel.

    Also, maybe school systems should actually encourage students to excel in reading, not just to “do better.” From 4th to 6th grades my daughter consistently tested in the top 1% or 2% in the national standardized tests, but because she was only ever in the top 20% or so of math scores, and STEM interests drive all the gifted programs, the school system could do nothing for her in terms of providing reading assignments that met her level and kept her interest. We opted her out of all tests at that point.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: