On the 2018 Nebula Award Finalists Controversy

On the 2018 Nebula Award Finalists Controversy Link Post

There is a budding controversy in SF that is on the verge of become a minor scandal. It seems a Facebook group called 20Booksto50k may or may not be the source of a slate of nominees for the 2018 Nebula Award. I was going to write a post covering this issue, but then I found Cara Buhlert's work and Camestros Felapton's posts on this topic and was no longer sure I could do better.

Writing about fandom really isn't my thing, so perhaps this is just as well.

So instead of a post, here's a recommended reading list to help you catch up on the story. (Since the FB group in question is closed, and thus can't be read by non-members, all of the links lead to blog posts.)

You should start with the thoughts and musings section at the end of Cora Buhlert's post from 21 February. Then go read Camestros Felapton's post from 21 February on the not-a-slate. Then read Buhlert's reaction post from a week later, and head over to File 770 to read the official statement from the SFWA and a statement from the originator of the "slate".

I have been distantly following this story since the finalists were announced a couple weeks ago, and I am a member of that group (since April 2018, to be exact). I don't beleive that either an official or unofficial attempt to nominate a slate. The group in question is dedicated to helping authors _legitimately_ achieve commercial success through writing stories that people want to buy.

I do not believe this was an attempt to game the system, but that is, however, what ended up happening.

image by JSJ1946 via Flickr

Nate Hoffelder

View posts by Nate Hoffelder
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader. He has been blogging about indie authors since 2010 while learning new tech skills weekly. He fixes author sites, and shares what he learns on The Digital Reader's blog. In his spare time, he fosters dogs for A Forever Home, a local rescue group.

12 Comments

    1. Erin6 March, 2019

      Yikes. That is detailed and I feel bad for the authors who are going through this without any clue of how this drama works and unfolds, especially fueled by Twitter.

      Reply
  1. Chris Lopes4 March, 2019

    This isn’t about slates, it’s about the fact that a whole bunch of people not connected to traditional publishing are actually selling books when members of SFWA aren’t. My guess is the SFWA will find a way to lock the independents out of the Nebula, and said independents will just go back to making money. Then the Nebulas can remain as relevant to SF as the Hugos are.

    Reply
    1. Nate Hoffelder5 March, 2019

      “when members of SFWA aren’t”

      You have absolutely zero evidence to back up that claim, but if it makes you feel better to tell yourself that, knock yourself out.

      Reply
      1. Chris Lopes5 March, 2019

        I don’t care etheir way actually, but your reaction is a tell.

        Reply
        1. Nate Hoffelder5 March, 2019

          Then why did you make a baseless claim that spun the situation as “successful indies being excluded by failing SFWA clique”?

          If that wasn’t your goal then you should really be more careful with your word choice.

          Reply
  2. Chris Lopes5 March, 2019

    The problem is you have a supposedly professional organization that doesn’t seem to trust its members to act professionally. SFWA isn’t WorldCom. A bunch of alt-right trolls aren’t going to buy their way in to nominate some dipstick tome about space raptor butt sex. So I ask myself why SFWA is over reacting to a recommendation list. It smells like fear.

    Reply
    1. Nate Hoffelder5 March, 2019

      What has the SFWA done besides release a neutral statement?

      Reply
      1. Chris Lopes5 March, 2019

        The statements of some of its members have been far from neutral. In any case, an organization that doesn’t trust its members doesn’t deserve to have any.

        Reply
        1. Nate Hoffelder5 March, 2019

          You made a classic logical flaw when you conflated persons and the group. They are not the same any more than a random Democrat on Twitter is the same as the Democratic Party. (This kind of political thinking is why I am glad I don’t write about fandom.)

          Also, the SFWA does trust its members:

          And finally, when it comes to every Nebula Awards ballot, we ask that you judge each of the works with care and consideration. The work that stays with you, that moves you, that work that you love the most should earn your vote. It is our hope that you will join us on this very first step, showing just how strong we all can be when we work together.

          Reply
  3. Chris Lopes5 March, 2019

    If the members aren’t the organization, then this is all to do about nothing. There is obviously no controversy and we can ignore the chatter.

    Reply
    1. Disgusting Dude5 March, 2019

      The problem with attributing the deeds of some members of the SFWA to the whole organization is that the SFWA membership includes Indies and has since 2015.

      Check out the requirements:

      http://www.sfwa.org/about/join-us/sfwa-membership-requirements/

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to top