Skip to main content

Bigotry Strikes the Kindle Store

Amazon removed some yaoi manga titles from the Kindle Store this week. A variety of titles have been affected, including: King of Debt, The Color of Love, and Weekend Lovers. Some of the removed titles have been there for years, and it was only this week that Amazon decided it had a problem with them.

So what is yaoi manga? To put it simply, it’s a particular type of Japanese comic that features gay romance stories (usually 2 guys). And that’s where the bigotry comes in.

You see, Amazon aren’t removing the straight romance comics, just the yaoi manga. Amazon also haven’t removed copies of Lolita, Moll Flanders, or frankly Harlequin’s entire line of ebooks. Amazon haven’t even touched the similarly themed straight romance comics.  No, all that has been affected today is yaoi manga.

Someone at Amazon removed these titles based on their personal objection to the genre. And that, folks, is bigotry.

Here are the specific rules that were violated:

Pornography and hard-core material that depicts graphic sexual acts.

Offensive Material
What we deem offensive is probably about what you would expect. Amazon Digital Services, Inc. reserves the right to determine the appropriateness of Titles sold on our site.

I would have less of a problem is these titles had never been allowed in, or if the rule were being applied evenly across all genres. But that’s not the case. Some unnamed drone discovered these particular titles in the Kindle Store and was so disgusted by them that the titles were pulled. And that, folks, is bigotry.

Don’t you just love how vague that second rule is? Leaving aside the parochialism, it gives Amazon a cover for the whim of any drone who decides to pull a title from the Kindle Store.

via Robot 6

Similar Articles


renzo May 5, 2011 um 3:37 am

The curious thing is that the paper version is still in the book store, as the paper version of Alan Moore’s Lost Girl is there.

Why should they censure the kindle store and not the book store?

Nate Hoffelder October 25, 2011 um 11:06 pm

Perhaps because they can pull the ebooks with just a click and not have to justify it to anyone. Pulling the paper copy probably requires an override so it’s not restocked. it may not be possible to pull the paper copy, actually.

Perry May 5, 2011 um 12:57 pm

Hmm, perhaps a mistake?

I am curious how you would clearly define offensive material. As an indie e-publisher we struggled with our disclaimer for pornography and offensive material. It’s not because we want to apply our own ideas to other people’s tastes, it’s because we need an out when someone sends us work that is based on hate or degrading behaviour.

Ravi May 5, 2011 um 11:11 pm

I wouldn’t rush to judgement on this.

While Amazon has made some troubling decisions about what they’re willing to sell, they also have often been "attacked" by groups with a political agenda. They often organize people to complain about certain books (in order to get them labeled more restrictively or pulled altogether).

Based on what I’ve read so far, I’m not sure which case applies here.

Michael May 7, 2011 um 11:12 am

Because of Amazon’s treatment of Wikileaks, I dumped my account there, and recently bought a Nook (my first reader). I do wish that others would respond similarly: talking is cheap, but our money is the only real power we have against things like this.

Liz May 10, 2011 um 1:58 pm

They target this demographic frequently, if memory serves. It’s more than likely specific moderators that see something they object to and CLICK! it’s gone without having to answer for themselves.

Light the Torches – Amazon is Censoring eBooks Again – The Digital Reader March 15, 2012 um 11:28 pm

[…] right now, and a question that we need Amazon to answer for us.This should come as no surprise; Amazon has pulled DMP titles before. But it does make today’s new particularly disappointing; DMP had been trying to toe the […]

Write a Comment