Skip to main content

Google Play Books Gets a Behind the Scenes Update

google play books itunesGoogle may have come into the ebook market via a roundabout method but now that it’s in the market the tech giant is here to stay.

They’ve been making a number of behind the scenes improvements over the past year, including changing their accepted formats list to include Epub3, and today they announced a major update to the Google Play Books Partner Center.

This is a behind the scenes section of Google Play Books which is similar in function to Amazon KDP. It’s not the kind of thing that customers will ever see, but the changes and improvements that Google has made are probably going to be deeply appreciated by publishers.

According to the overview page for the new Partner Center, the new and updated features include:

In short, Google is trying to make it easier for publishers and authors to manage the ebooks sold via Google Play Books. And it is a good thing that Google made these improvements; I’m told that the set up of the old Partner Center was convoluted, arcane, and obtuse.

David Haywood Young, an indie author, blogged in January 2013 about his experience with trying to sell ebooks through Google Play Books. Highlights of his experience include:

  • There’s nothing to make this obvious, but you’ll need to go set up all sorts of account-management stuff, probably to include a bank account, before anything will actually be sold.
  • Seriously: nothing will tell you that you need to set up the financial bit first. But you gotta.
  • Google Books in general is set up to assume they’re getting a print book. They base their app’s user interface on that assumption. So you’ll have to tell them specifically to use the same ISBN you already gave them for an ebook.
  • And if they’re not getting a print book, they mostly expect a PDF. I have no idea why, but you’ll probably end up with a better-formatted EPUB if you just create your own.
  • Almost forgot: remember the thing about expecting print books? Well, if you give them a “buy link” for your book in their Preview program, they’ll put up a button telling people that link is for a print version. So if you’re selling ebooks on your own site, or you want to link to an Amazon ebook version, or whatever…it doesn’t quite work.
  • Maybe this is already obvious. But if you do something within Google’s app, don’t expect an acknowledgement for a few days…at least. It wants you to do stuff, but it’s shy and won’t say exactly what–and then it doesn’t want to admit you’ve already done it either. Pity the poor socially-awkward beast if you can, but don’t hate it. I’m fairly sure it means well.

And as you can see from the following screenshot, Google is still showing signs of being focused on paper books rather than ebooks:

google play books partner center

David’s not the only one to have issues.

Remember the incident with the public domain ebooks which were deleted from the Google Play Books app when the owner crossed an international border?

I tried to fact check the tale and got an earful on Google Play Books from a number of contacts in digital publishing. None could confirm the accuracy of the story, but most thought the technical snafu was entirely possible. That says something about Google’s reputation in digital publishing.

I also have reports from elsewhere that Google was ignoring the DRM settings for some European publishers. Those publishers had chosen digital watermarks, but Google encumbered the ebooks with Adobe DE DRM.

Hopefully Google has turned over a new leaf.

The updates over the past year represent Google’s ongoing investment in ebooks. At this point they may have only 1% to 3% of the global ebook market (depending on who you ask) but it looks like they are interested in fighting for a larger share.

At the moment Google sells ebooks in 19 countries. They have been slowing adding new markets in bunches, with the most recent additions launching in June and July. So long as they keep that list short they probably won’t account for much, but I expect that their long term plans include selling ebooks in s many countries as they currently sell Android apps

Thanks, David and David!

Similar Articles


David Gaughran September 6, 2013 um 7:25 am

Hey Nate,

It looks like the front-end got a major overhaul yesterday too. Not everyone is seeing the new version yet – possibly being rolled out in stages – but I can see it here in the UK, and a bunch of friends can see it in the US.

The interface is much improved. There’s still some buggy/non-intuitive aspects, but it’s a million times better.

It must be said, though, that there are two key drawbacks to Google Play that will keep a lot of indies away:

1. Royalty rate is only 52%.

2. Google have the power to aribtrarily discount from your list price. You will get 52% of list, but that discounting can (and does) lead to price-matching by Amazon, potentially dropping your book below $2.99 there, and out of the pricing zone to receive 70% royalties. Obviously, this can lead to a drastic change in income. A workaround has been suggested by some. Apparently Google don’t tend to discount more than 33%, so you can factor that into your Google-specific pricing as an insurance. Far from ideal though.


David Haywood Young September 6, 2013 um 11:20 am

They say all publicity is good, as long as your name’s spelled correctly. {8′>

But I agree about the discounting issue. In the post you linked to above, I said I thought it might not be a major problem because rumors were flying that Amazon was price-matching less often. But Google discounted -every- title, and Amazon price-matched every one of ’em.

So at this point I figure Google Play is a great place to put anything that’s supposed to be perma-free.

I pulled everything else for now.

Nate Hoffelder September 6, 2013 um 11:33 am

I don’t know what you’re complaining about; I can spell just fine.

See: j-u-s-t f-i-n-e.

David Haywood Young September 6, 2013 um 11:39 am


Nate Hoffelder September 6, 2013 um 11:48 am

LOL. I fixed your name.

David Haywood Young September 6, 2013 um 11:50 am

I saw {8′>

Write a Comment