Skip to main content

It’s 2 Years Old But Gingerbread is Still the Single Most Run Version of Android

chartGoogle released new data this morning on which versions of Android are the most popular, and in spite of the many Android tablet and smartphones given as Christmas gifts older (and still quite functional) versions of Android continue to dominate.

The 2 and a half year old Android 2.2 Froyo is still hanging on with a respectable 9% share, putting it ahead of newer versions of Android like 3.0/3.1/3.2 Honeycomb. It’s still close on the heels of the newest version of  Android, Jelly Bean, which now has 10.2% of the market.

Note: This info doesn’t reflect all Android devices, just the ones which access Google Play. So there is some unknown number of devices out there which run Android but aren’t factored into these stats.  Examples include the Kindle Fire, Nooks, and a bunchaton of budget Android tablets.

The year-old Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich is in a solid second place with a 29% share, but the single most commonly used version of Android is still 2.3 Gingerbread. As a result of new devices activated over Christmas, this version of Android is no longer running on half of all Android gadgets. No, it’s down to 47.2%.

The continued dominance of the older versions of Android are something of a problem for the platform. It’s a source of frustration for app developers who want to make the best app they can, but are unfortunately blocked from using features found only in the later versions of Android. It’s also frustrating to device makers, but not just because the older devices are still in use.

The bigger problem is that Android tablets running Android 2.3, 2.0, and even the so-old-it-should-be-getting Social Security Android 1.5 Cupcake are still sitting on store shelves. They’re still being sold as new devices; I can say that for a fact because I am still seeing commenters show up and ask questions.

This is a problem which is  likely going to continue to grow worse as new versions of Android are released.  Developers are already having to write off the early versions of Android, and that leads to the unfortunate situation of new owners finding out they can’t run current apps on their new device.

All this adds up to Android having the reputation that app support is miss, hit, or miss, and the only one who benefits from that is Apple.

Apple’s limited hardware set makes it a lot easier for developers to support, and it also makes it easier for Apple to release firmware updates. According to Chitika new versions of iOS are adopted rapidly, with iOS6 hitting the 50% in less than a couple months.

Google only wishes they could match that.



Similar Articles


Charles January 4, 2013 um 10:38 am

"but the leading version of Android is still Android 2.3 Honeycomb." – looks like a editorial mistake got through.

Nate Hoffelder January 4, 2013 um 10:40 am

It could have been better written, yes. Thanks!

Frank Skornia January 4, 2013 um 12:26 pm

Shouldn’t that Honeycomb say Gingerbread?

Nate Hoffelder January 4, 2013 um 12:42 pm


Ross January 4, 2013 um 5:00 pm

I have both a Kindle Fire and a Kindle Fire HD 8.9″. Amazon does do upgrades for these devices. How many of the Androd devices running older versions have had no upgrades issued by their makers or for phones not rolled out by the carriers who control the software upgrades for the phones that they sell?

Once sold, most manufacturers will cease to support a device shortly after they cease production of the device. They don’t make money from the upgrades, they would rather sell you a new device. The carriers have no incentive to have you upgrade the OS on your phone, it takes bandwidth to do so and provides no benefit to them to do so.

Net result can be seen in how many older devices run current version of the OS.

Write a Comment