Diary of Anne Frank is Now Free to Download, Get It Before It Is DMCAed

2876537323_d70b43f0ea_bLike we do every year, the US is missing out on the public domain party, but over in Europe a couple seminal works have just passed into the public domain.

In much of Europe copyright expires seventy calendar years after the death after the death of the creator, which means that works by authors who died in 1945 passed into the public domain in Europe today.

That includes, for example, the original German text for Hitler's Mein Kampf, but just as importantly the original Dutch-language Diary of Anne Frank has also passed into the public domain in Europe. (Coincidentally, both works had passed into the public domain in 1995, in Canada and other nations with a death plus fifty copyright term.)

Written between 1942 and 1945 while the young Anne Frank was hiding with her family during the Nazi occupation of Amsterdam, the diary is one of the best original documents that detail what people went through under the Nazi regime. It was originally published in the Netherlands and elsewhere in 1947 (including the US).

The copyright on the diary ran out on 1 January 2016, and within a few hours of the clock striking midnight on the new year in Europe, the full text was available to read online or download.

The work can be found on the blog of French parliament member Isabelle Attard, as well as other sites, in MSWord, text, and Epub. There was also suggestions that the Anne Frank House museum was going to publish the diary as an interactive website, but I have not found it yet.

3759673359_66ef5d9354_o

The release comes amidst a messy legal dispute brought about by copyfraud claims from Anne Frank Fonds, the Swiss non-profit that had held the copyright on the diary. Established by Anne's father Otto Frank, the foundation has profited from the copyright for over 40 years, and earlier this year it sought to extend control of its revenue source via a novel legal argument.

The Anne Frank Fonds declared in 2014, and reiterated last year, that it had decided that the first published version of the diary was actually the work of both Otto Frank and Anne Frank. With Otto Frank now the co-author, the work would theoretically remain under copyright for another 35 years (Otto Frank died in 1980).

This claim is obviously in dispute, with some arguing that it lessens the impact of the diary, while others criticizing it for the legal problems it creates and the retroactive nature of the claim.

For now, the work remains online, but the foundation has said as recently as Tuesday that it believes that the hand-written manuscripts are still under copyright because, and I am not making this up, the original manuscripts were not published until the 1980s (nearly 40 years after the first version of the diary was published).

The foundation is also continuing to claim that Otto Frank is the co-author of that first version, and that it is still under copyright as well.

Whether that last claim stands up in court is difficult to say, but this story is clearly not over with yet.

The Verge

images by Rodrigo Galindez, by kencf0618

About Nate Hoffelder (11062 Articles)
Nate Hoffelder is the founder and editor of The Digital Reader: "I've been into reading ebooks since forever, but I only got my first ereader in July 2007. Everything quickly spiraled out of control from there. Before I started this blog in January 2010 I covered ebooks, ebook readers, and digital publishing for about 2 years as a part of MobileRead Forums. It's a great community, and being a member is a joy. But I thought I could make something out of how I covered the news for MobileRead, so I started this blog."

3 Comments on Diary of Anne Frank is Now Free to Download, Get It Before It Is DMCAed

  1. And people wonder why piracy is so prevalent.

  2. Actually, it will probably never be DMCA’d. The DMCA is an American law, and this is strictly a European issue—a European publishing it because it’s theoretically in the public domain there now, and other Europeans claiming that no it’s not, because it suddenly magically acquired a later-deceased co-author. It might be taken down, but it wouldn’t be because of the DMCA.

    (Anyway, it’s in Dutch, and the average English-speaker wouldn’t be able to read it.)

    • Okay, the foundation is more likely to tell the webhosts to take the content down or the foundation will sue. Technically that is not a DMCA notice, but it is close enough that I thought it better to use the familiar term.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*