FeedSpot Is the Work of Developers Who Think Grey Text on a White Background is Great Idea

226951v2-max-250x250[1]Google Reader might be mostly dead but my search for a replacement continues. Today I have an also-ran candidate that was a serious contender until the gray text on a white background started annoying me too much.

Feedspot is not one of the many news readers inspired by the Readerpocalypse. It launched into a private beta in August 2012, and according to the Feedspot blog, this service just went into public beta last week.

Click here for more Google Reader alternatives.

At first glance this news reader is a near perfect clone of Google Reader.  It uses a basic white background and separates the feed list on the left from the list of posts on the right with clean thin black borders. It has a well developed suite of features, including both an internal social network as well as support for other social networks. You can also search within feeds.

feedspot screenshot 1

It's currently browser only, but the developers are currently working on apps for Android, iPad, and iPhone. Other current projects include an API and searching within your feeds (already done).

Feedspot offers the list view I need, and it has a decent looking reading mode. It's nothing fancy, but it's also not too wide:

feedspot screenshot 2

But as I really started using it I quickly realized that the gray text on the white background was killing me.  The list of folders and feeds on the left is simply too difficult for me to read, much less scan quickly, and that renders Feedspot unusable (for me, at least).

Other shortcomings include an inability to hide feeds and folders that don't have new content. Feedspot is also updating my feeds in some bizarre order that I don't understand; rather than sort all the new posts based on time and date Feedspot instead displays clumps of posts from each feed. One way to fix this would be to upgrade to Feedspot's paid service (this offers faster feed crawling, better tech support, etc), but it's not for me.

And last but not least Feedspot responds to a click anywhere in the text of a post by closing the post. That might be their idea of the norm for web browsing but it  differs from what I expect to happen on webpages. It also drives me up the wall.

I must say that I like the general layout and I would like to build up a network of news junkies, but this news junkie can't get past the gray text on a white background. (Why anyone would think this is a good idea is beyond me.)


Click here for more Google Reader alternatives.

6 thoughts on “FeedSpot Is the Work of Developers Who Think Grey Text on a White Background is Great Idea

  1. Agreed. I said I was using feedwrangler but I’m being dragged kicking and screaming over to it.

    I would much rather perfer to keep using NetNewswire and syncing with google reader.

    If they come up with a decent syncing option I’d be back to Netnewswire in a shot.

  2. There’s also no way to remove your name or discontinue your profile that is easily discernible. I got an email saying my blog has so many new followers at feedspot…c’mon over and sign up. I signed up with an account I use just for junk I’m not sure of, and sure enough. You can’t do much in there without upgrading to the premium version, and you can’t delete your profile. No, thanks.

  3. Feedspot will SPAM all your contacts without warning. There is no way to delete your account. I tried to send a message to [email protected], asking them to delete my account and all the answer I got was that they will stop to send invitations to all my contacts. No account removal, I guess. Maybe they are such a lousy people they don’t know how to do it…
    If there was a place to make a complain about them, I’ll be the first to do it! They are a SPAM app, that’s all.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>