Skip to main content

Feedbooks responds to yesterday’s Blio launch

Calvin Reid over at Publisher’s Weekly posted a follow up article this morning where he contact KNFB (developer of Blio) and asked them to explain some of the details of yesterday’s debacle. One comment made by Peter Chapman, the KNFB spokesman, caught my eye. He said that Feedbooks knew it was being included in Blio months before the launch.

I checked with Hadrien Gardeur, founder and CEO of Feedbooks. According to Hadrien, they were not asked, they were _told_ by Mike Angelo that Feedbooks would be included. When Hadrien protested, he was ignored. I like the reasons he gave for objecting, so I copied his email to the end of this post.

This is actually worse, if you ask me. It’s one thing if you forget to ask, but asking and ignoring the "no", well, in terms of business ethics I think it falls just short of piracy.

Okay, that was melodramatic, but what they did was still pretty bad. What do you think?

The email:

More precisely:
  • I’ve known for a while that KNFB were using our OPDS feeds for dedicated systems designed for print-disabled people ( Which I’m glad they’re doing.
  • Two months ago, Mike Angelo sent me an e-mail asking if we could add Blio to our premium partners on our ecosystem page because Feedbooks would be part of Blio. I replied that I wasn’t aware that Blio planned on including Feedbooks and that I was against it for several reasons (see below). He never replied.
At Feedbooks we allow reading systems to preload our catalog if it provides the following features:
  1. supports EPUB (not the case with Blio, they need to do a conversion)
  2. fully supports OPDS (once again, not the case with Blio, they don’t offer our full catalog, they only aggregate a few of our feeds and use our search feature)
  3. enable users to add OPDS catalogs (not the case with Blio)
  4. if the reading system also includes commercial content, we require that the reading system should also support payment in OPDS and ACS4 support in order to sell content
If a reading system doesn’t support all four (or the first three if it’s oriented towards free books like FBReader for example), they can still provide OPDS support and let users add manually our catalog.

Similar Articles


Jane September 29, 2010 um 11:05 am

Oh Blio. What an embarrassment.

Mike Cane September 29, 2010 um 11:14 am

*snort* Blio the bully. No one wants to play with you now!

Blio, new eBook reader, is here. It even smells fresh and clean. | Assistivetechno's Blog September 29, 2010 um 12:02 pm

[…] Digital Reader – Feedbooks responds to yesterday’s Blio launch Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)O Blio, Blio, wherefore art thou Blio?BBC Posts […]

igorsk September 29, 2010 um 2:09 pm

So did he disable the feed to them yet? Not sure if it’s possible but would’ve been a nice move IMO.

Blio Launches With Glitches – eBookNewser September 29, 2010 um 2:42 pm

[…] signing a deal with, but just hadn’t given Feedbooks the exact launch date.  But The Digital Reader followed up and found out that Gardeur did not know. From the Digital Reader blog: “…they were […]

BS January 25, 2011 um 5:26 am

when did feedbooks get disabled in blio reader, you would think feedbooks would be ok with users downloading their free books, no matter what program is helping the users do so, this is just politics by feedbooks makers or haters
now you can just only download google books
what is feedbooks hiding and should they be shutdown for this behavor , some say yes they should be shutdown, because their are plenty of other sources that don’t steal from ebooks and rename and call them their own ebooks etc.. at least I think its feedbooks that is using gutenberg sources, not very cool unless I confesting feedbooks with manybooks or epubbooks sources, its hard to say which is best besides google books of course

Write a Comment