People Are Weird About Books, and Attempts to "Improve" or "Fix" Books in a Web Browser Prove it
The first thing thing you should know about reading books in a web browser is that far more developers than users are excited about the idea of making a digital book look just like a print book.
I was reminded of this last night when I read about yet another startup that had rediscovered making stories read in a web browser look more book-like.
Books in their current form are thousands of years old, dating back to the Roman Empire. And even today’s e-books preserve the visual cues of their traditional analog counterparts, with tables of contents, page numbers, and the affordance of “turning the page” by swiping. Reading in your browser, however, has retained little of the charm of reading a book, digital or real.
Now, the New York-based design studio HAWRAF is bringing some of those visual cues to a new digital book platform. In essence, it’s a browser-based e-book. Designed specifically for a new online book called Poetic Computation: Reader by Taeyoon Choi, the platform lets users play around with font, text size, line spacing, and background color. When you click on the footnotes, located in tiny typography to the right of the main text, they overtake the main text so you can get a closer look. Meanwhile, anything you highlight can be exported as a PDF, letting you turn the most relevant parts of the book into a printable file. A “focus mode” blacks out most of the browser, keeping your wandering eyes from getting distracted. It’s the best aspects of reading online, combined with those of an actual book.
The second thing you should know about reading books in a web browser is that it’s not exactly a new concept.
Fifty-eleven different developers have executed this idea over the past couple decades. This includes Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and Kobo, each of which have released a browser-based reader, Ibis Reader, a few dozen independent developers who released browser extensions, and Safari Books Online, which has been serving up nonfiction books in a web browser since forever.
It’s an old idea, and for the most part it hasn’t gone anywhere. Two of the
The three ebook retailers have shut down their web apps, most of the independent developers have moved on to other projects, and just about the only project that persisted is Safari Books Online – and that stuck around largely because that browser app is the core of their subscription service.
The thing is, readers are indifferent to the idea reading books in a web browser.
Or to be more exact, readers are ambivalent to the obsession that some have with making books in a web browser look exactly like those books would look on paper.
And yes, this focus on vestigial aspects of paper books is an obsession – and a strange one, when you really sit back and think about it.
People spend inordinate amounts of time reading in web browsers, and yet no one insists that Wikipedia would be better if it were formatted like an encyclopedia, no one wants The Atlantic to look more like a magazine, and no one insists news sites should look more like newspapers.
Instead, the trend for web content leans to a clean single column layout (think Instapaper, or Google AMP).
It is only with books that the crazy people start coming out of the woodwork, insisting that the digital books in a web browser have to ape unimportant characteristics of print books.
I have said it before, but it bears repeating.
Randy Lea September 29, 2017 um 11:40 am
The solution to this problem is the PDF file, which is also the worst invention in history.
Nate Hoffelder September 29, 2017 um 1:38 pm
There are a lot of ebook formats worse than PDF, including all the fixed-layout formats, the obscure formats, the online-only formats – need I go on?
Carmen Webster Buxton September 29, 2017 um 12:24 pm
For me, reading books is very different from other kinds of reading. I read mostly fiction, science fiction, mysteries, some historical fiction, including historical romance. I read almost exclusively on my Kindle Voyage, which for plain text books— no illustrations, no fancy formatting– works fine. It lets me control the level of light and the size of font. If the publisher has done the work to set up the X-Ray feature I sometimes find that helpful. And, unlike my laptop or a tablet, I can hold it in one hand and even read lying down in bed. I will admit the few times I have read books with footnotes, they were not usually formatted in a way that was easy to read.
But any effort to format books for reading in a web browser is gong to be wasted on me because I don’t want to have to be online to read a book.
DaveMich September 29, 2017 um 3:26 pm
I sometimes find myself in a position where I would like to read a few chapters of a book while waiting for something to finish on my computer. The kindle cloud reader works great for that. Ever tried it?
The OP must not get out much.
Nate Hoffelder September 29, 2017 um 3:33 pm
what was I thinking of when I Wrote that?
DaveMich September 29, 2017 um 6:32 pm
by OP I did not mean you, but whoever went to all the trouble to do this piece of work. Kindle cloud reader gives you all the interface you want and otherwise gets out of your way.
Tom S September 29, 2017 um 8:57 pm
Google also has.’read in browser’. It is not particularly mobile friendly, but it is okay for desktop browsers. Overdrive also has one, but I’ve never used it.
Tom S September 29, 2017 um 9:00 pm
Just tried Overdrive read-in-browser. Not bad on mobile browser, once book loads up.
Vikarti Anatra September 29, 2017 um 9:26 pm
Bookmate also have browser-based reader in addition to their mobile apps
Allen F September 30, 2017 um 1:41 am
Far too many offerings I find myself copying/pasting to Word or an editor where I can change the font and size to make it easier on my ageing eyes.
The ones I can’t 'fix' don’t get read. 😉
Harvey October 2, 2017 um 8:30 am
And don’t forgt Adobe’s Digital Editions. I have both ADE and Kindle reading apps on my computer, mostly so I can read samples and decide whether to buy and download to my devices.
Harvey October 2, 2017 um 8:38 am
Okay, can’t let it go. The contention in the original post that "Books in their current form are thousands of years old" is just annoying. Books in their current form date back to the late 1940s or early 1950s when what we know today as "traditional" publishers started publishing paperbacks. Just sayin'. And I would have said so in a comment on the OP but apparently they don’t allow comments.
Anthony October 2, 2017 um 11:52 am
I’ve always thought ebooks should just be a simple subset of HTML and that all browsers can handle reading them.