Sigil Gets Closer to Epub3 Editing in Beta Release
For the past ten months the open-source Epub creation tool Sigil has had an option to create Epub3 files, but only as a post-production conversion. Soon that will change.
The developers of Sigil have released a new version of the app which they say represents the first step towards better Epub3 support. It doesn’t add support for editing Epub3 files, but it is a step in the right direction:
Today we are releasing Sigil-0.8.900 which really represents the first of the Sigil 0.9.0 pre-releases whose eventual goal is to add epub3 support without disrupting epub2 editing.
To accomplish this, Sigil has had most of its internals torn out and rebuilt from scratch …
The developers went on to ask that anyone who installs the new release to please test it and report any irregularities they encounter, irregardless of scale. They want to iron out any difficulties ASAP before continuing development towards support for both Epub and Epub3.
You can download the pre-release Sigil from GitHub.
Let’s hope they can get through this quickly. According to what I’ve heard on Twitter, the current method for converting from Epub to an Epub 3 file (an external plugin) can take up to a minute to generate an Epub3 ebook (which sometimes needs some tweaking before it will validate).
That’s a workable solution, but it’s not ideal. Once all the bigs are worked out, the new way to create an Epub3 file should be as simple as selecting "Save As".
image by Cuyahoga jco
Mackay Bell September 28, 2015 um 9:14 pm
And what are the advantages of Epub3 over Epub2?
Nate Hoffelder September 28, 2015 um 9:42 pm
For most books sold today, there is no advantage.
Epub3 adds all sorts of fooferaw that aren’t used in very many ebooks.
Moriah Jovan September 28, 2015 um 11:29 pm
EPUB3 isn’t supported by anything that’s in heavy use (ADE, Kindle). I figure, it’ll be there when they all get their crap together.
David September 29, 2015 um 1:13 am
…one could argue that the "foofaraw" in epub3 not used by many ebooks is because you can’t do it in epub2 without using a platform specific proprietary format.
Moriah Jovan September 29, 2015 um 10:15 am
True. You could also argue it’s because the publishing houses are so far behind they wouldn’t a) know how to do it and b) InDesign isn’t a priority at Adobe. ADE is even less of one, which speaks to your point.
That’s what happened with EPUB2. It was (I think) 2 years before Adobe gave InDesign an export to EPUB option (while we’d been doing them from scratch forever). I have an EPU I’m doing that’s gorgeous, but I had to do it from scratch (including text) because the publisher only had the PDF and the print designer couldn’t make InDesign behave. The EPUB was an unbelievable mess coming from InDesign.
My money’s on the limitations of InDesign’s abilities. Coupled with the fact that Adobe forgot about ADE (on which Nook and BlueFire, to name two) are built, there’s no reason (that I can see) to do it.
I got the Sigil plugin a year ago because I heard whispers that it would be needed soon. I can’t see that “soon” on the horizon, but i’m prepared for it, by gum!
John September 29, 2015 um 10:28 am
Advantages of ePub 3?
– Accessibility (through semantics mainly, which screen readers parse and tell so if you have one non-fiction book with a lot of figures, asides, etc. it is definitely a plus).
– support of a lot of useful things per spec, which were not officially supported in ePub 2 (takes some practice to use some while not breaking the file in an ePub 2 reader though).
– better metadata.
– better nav.
– better support for multiple languages.
I could go on but basically, it’s a lot better, just because of HTML5, which proper use can truly benefit users.
Nate Hoffelder September 29, 2015 um 11:21 am
Better metadata? *swoon*
SteveHut September 29, 2015 um 4:07 pm
Methinks the only way EPUB3 will ever become a reality in the marketplace would be if KDP or Apple iBooks suddenly decided that it would become the new required format per a fixed transition date. (and that would cause all hell to break loose in the ebook production world).
Nate Hoffelder September 29, 2015 um 4:35 pm
I don’t see that happening.
They’ll take Epub3, but I seriously doubt Amazon would make it a requirement. That would be a speedbump, and Amazon doesn’t want that (which is why Amazon will take just about any well-formed ebook).
Also, Apple doesn’t care enough ro make that a requirement.
Moriah Jovan September 29, 2015 um 11:06 pm
I am not arguing that it’s not better. I would LOVE to be able to be excited about EPUB3 because it IS exciting, but what SteveHut said.