Skip to main content

Google Added Local Library eBook Listings to Search Results

Google just made it a little bit easier to check ebooks out of your local library.

Google announced today that they have integrated public library catalogs into their search results. I can’t see the new results page, but Android Police reported that the side ad-bar in Google’s search results now includes links to library listings:

This new feature works on both mobile and desktop and manifests simply. If you search for the title of a book, you’ll see one of two things. On desktop search, there’s an additional heading in the detailed results/information card on the right. But on mobile, it’s buried in the Get Book tab, just under the Buy ebook card.

I did run into some inconsistency with this new feature. While some books would bring up the Borrow ebook card without any problem, other titles just wouldn’t trigger it. While Cixin Liu’s "Three-Body Problem" had the extra field in results, searches for N. K. Jemisin’s recent Hugo Award winner "The Obelisk Gate" didn’t trigger the same behavior.

I first thought it might have to do with availability, but the card appeared for titles with universally long waiting lists, too. Behavior was the same for search on both desktop and mobile, and I’m at a loss to explain why.

That’s a neat trick, and one I will appreciate once I can actually use it.

My local library (Prince William Public Library) is just terrible at search.  It’s search feature was apparently programmed by a Yahoo intern in 2003, and never upgraded.

Yes, it is that bad, so any trick that bypasses the problems is a huge improvement.

Google via Android Police

What the "Book People" Won’t Tell You: Print is Dead

When I wrote that post on Friday about the Pod Book People who either can’t or won’t speak the truth about the current state of the industry, I was planning just to leave it at the level of patting myself on the back and thinking about how best to point out what the Book People weren’t saying the next time I quoted and commented on a piece from, say, Publishers Weekly or The Bookseller.

But an email on Saturday morning from a Book People pundit  got me thinking. That pundit thought he was a truth teller.  I disagreed, and as I laid out the reasons in my head I realized that I had a wishlist of what I wanted that pundit to say if they truly were ready to speak truth to power.

I have been writing about industry trends in bits and pieces in each news story, but it has been a long while since I last pulled everything together, took a step back, and told you what I see.

I can sum it up in a single sentence: The major publishers are dead because they bet against digital, which is the future.

The thing about the major publishers is that they thought they could make the market go where they wanted.

They didn’t want ebooks to cannibalize print sales, so they conspired with Apple in early 2010 to bring about the Agency model. Then they doubled down on their bet with Agency 2.0, and hedged that bet by sabotaging subscription ebook services like Scribd and Oyster by saddling them with nonviable business models.

It is now 2017, and book publishing is in the later stages of a transition to digital.

One of the two successful subscription ebook services, Kindle Unlimited, is now bigger than Kobo, Nook, and Google Play. The other, Safari Books Online, belongs to O’Reilly because Pearson bet against digital and sold its stake in 2014 when it should have bought the service.

Nonfiction sales have been cannibalized by the internet and services like Pluralsight and Youtube, textbook publishers are running scared at the thought that open source curricula is rendering them obsolete, and the fiction market has swung heavily to digital.

The major publishers bet against digital, and they continue to do so, and it is going to kill them in the long run. In fact, we can see them die bit by bit. First they dropped mid-list authors, then they started dropping best-selling authors.

At this point it is an absolute certainty that any publisher that isn’t focusing digital first and print second is jut as dead as the Big Five. (Yes, there are some categories and niches that are exceptions to the rule, but I stand by my prediction.)

The future of book publishing is digital. Are you ready to face it, or will you join Penguin Random House on the scrap heap of history?

image by John Vetterli

Remarkable E-ink Writing Slate Reviews – Great Tablet, But Not Ready for Prime Time

If that early buzz for the $600 Remarkable tablet had you wishing that you had gotten in on the early pre-orders, I have good news for you:

It’s not ready yet.

A handful of reviews were posted on Friday, and they show reveal that the Remarkable still has a way to go in the software department (this could explain why it missed the official mid-August shipdate).

This writing slate measures 10.1″ by 6.9″ by 0.36″ thin, and according to official specs it weighs about 12 ounces. runs a proprietary Linux OS on a 1GHz CPU with 512MB RAM and 8GB of internal storage (there is no card slot).

It has a 10.3″ Carta E-ink display (1872 x 1404 resolution – 226 PPI).  The Remarkable doesn’t have a frontlight, but it does have a capacitive touchscreen and a  Wacom stylus that supports 2,048 levels of pressure sensitivity and 512 degrees of tilt detection.

Aside from the screen and the stylus, those specs sound like what you can find on a $100 to $200 ereader, and you can also find cheaper ereaders that are almost s good as the Remarkable (like the Onyx Boox M96, which costs $430, runs Android with a 9,7″ E-ink screen, and has both dual-touchscreens).

Is the remarkable worth the extra $170 for an ereader cum writing slate?

Based on the following reviews, I would say yes – once the software is done.

Stuff.co.nz

At £529 just for the tablet, with the pen sold separately, this is a seriously expensive device. It’s fantastic at what it does, and the crowdfunding campaign that got it off the ground has been a resounding success, but prioritising the writing experience above all else has forced some compromises.

With no backlight or frontlight, a Kindle is still probably your best bet if you’re mainly after an eBook reader. Digital artists that aren’t interested in working purely in greyscale will be better served by an iPad Pro or Microsoft Surface, even if their respective styli can’t match ReMarkable for convincing feel.

 

Business Insider

I was excited about the potential of the reMarkable tablet, but unfortunately, it didn’t quite meet my expectations.

That said, I still think it’s an incredible product. The instantaneous nature of the ink is truly impressive, and every person I showed it to was blown away. The prospect of being able to take handwritten notes but save them digitally — not to mention sync them to your computer — is thrilling for those who prefer notepads over notepad apps.

But in making the quickest writing and drawing experience it could, I felt like reMarkable sacrified quickness on the other end. The device’s tendency to burn-in was a real problem, as was the slowness to turn the page or navigate back to the home screen. The tablet’s user interface still needs work to make it more intuitive, and the overall design could look slightly more modern. In its current form, paying $600 for an E Ink tablet like this in 2017 still seems too steep to me.

Wired

Even the best paper notebook needs a good pen—or in this case, a good stylus, to be worth using. The reMarkable comes with a Wacom stylus that works impressively well on the e-ink display, with hardly any latency. It’s tilt and pressure sensitive for better accuracy, but the results can be shaky, so don’t count on it replacing your sketchbook just yet. Those kinks aside, palm rejection works great, and the stylus doesn’t have a battery, so no need to awkwardly plug it into the bottom of your tablet.

When you’re done jotting down ideas for your screenplay or doodling away, you can bounce over to your eBooks tab and dive into The Jungle or Crash Override. Unfortunately, you won’t get as good a reading experience as you’d find on a Kindle due to a few shortcomings.

I found that text doesn’t look as crisp (limited font options don’t help things, either) and then there’s no bookstore so getting your digital library onto the reMarkable is a hassle. If those issues don’t bother you, there are some nice perks like a larger screen and the ability to write notes into a book’s margins, which you can’t do with a Kindle.

Laptop Magazine

The reMarkable’s amazing writing experience is a one-of-a-kind feature that when combined with its cloud-sync capabilities and Photoshop-esque editing, makes it a great tool for note takers and artists alike. Writing on the slate is one of the most realistic, comfortable experiences I’ve had on a tablet, rivaled only by using an actual pen and paper.

Of course, $599 may be a tough price to swallow for some, especially when the device is made just for writing, drawing and reading. For a more feature-rich tablet, consider the $649 10.5-inch iPad Pro, which supports Apple’s $99 Pencil stylus. It’s $149 more expensive, though, and writing on its glass doesn’t feel as natural. However, the iPad has Apple’s huge library of apps and games, while reMarkable has a much more limited offering. Still, the reMarkable has to be used to be truly believed, as writers and artists looking for the best marriage of digital and analogue won’t find a better option.

Popular Mechanics

The drawing is great, but navigating the tablet’s interface is less so. You’ll basically have to memorize the meanings of it icon-labeled on-screen buttons. I still routinely do things like delete an entire page of notes when I meant to select the eraser (undo to the rescue), or create a new page when I mean to navigate to anther digital notebook. I also found myself wanting to touch the on-screen buttons with my finger, as not to move the stylus away from what I was writing, and, frustratingly, this does work but only about 50 percent of the time.

The eBook Reader

In terms of ereading features, the reMarkable is very basic. It supports PDF and DRM-free ePub files, but the software is still a work-in-progress so that makes it hard to review at this point. They plan on adding more features over time; I’ll update this review to reflect any changes as they get added.

At present there’s no table of contents, no dictionary, no bookmarks, no search, no active hyperlinks, no back button, no annotations list, no pinch-zooming, no finger-swipe page turning.

What it does offer is a jump to page option and you can view a list of thumbnails to move around parts of a book.

There are a couple of different ways to zoom in. It has a cropping option that works quite well, and there’s a zoom dial to zoom in and out in increments. Zooming resets with each page turn but cropping remains.

You can add notes and highlights with the stylus, of course, but there is no list to view them or way to add bookmarks so it makes it kind of a hassle to find them unless you remember the page number they were on or manually scan through thumbnail view.

Digital Trends

The pen’s stellar performance stands in contrast to the rest of the experience, unfortunately.

The ReMarkable tablet suffers from the telltale limitations of E Ink technology: Tapping on a menu key or scroll wheel basically guarantees a delay and screen flashes while the tablet refreshes. It doesn’t come close to the responsiveness of the stylus, and it’s incredibly frustrating.

The ReMarkable tablet’s battery life is a little better than its performance, but it didn’t last as long as I’d like. After a typical 9-to-5 day of jotting down reminders, organizing my to-do list, and absent-mindedly doodling, I could count on the 3,000mAh battery dipping well below 40 percent by midweek.

ReMarkable’s engineers say they’re targeting two weeks of standby time, which seems a little optimistic. But we’ll have to take their word for it.

Liliputing

Kindle Unlimited Funding Pool, Per-Page Rate Up in August 2017

The Kindle Unlimited revenue stats for August 2017 show a reversal of a year-long trend.

Amazon announced that the funding pool grew by $400,000 from July 2017, to $19.4 million. At the same time, data from Self-Publisher Bibel shows that the per-page rate increased to $0.004193 per page, up from $0.004035 in July 2017.

  • US: $0.0042 (USD)
  • Germany: €0.0029 (EUR)
  • UK: £0.0032 (GBP)
  • Netherlands, France, Spain, Italy: €0.0042 (EUR)
  • Canada: $0.0041 (CAD)
  • India: 0.0816 (INR)
  • Brazil: R$ 0.0101 (BRL)
  • Japan: 0.5193 (JPY)
  • Australia: $0.0036 (AUD)
  • Mexico: $0.0698 (MXP)

P.S. Here’s a list of the monthly funding pools. It does not include the bonuses paid out each month.

  • July 2014: $2.5 million (Kindle Unlimited launches early in the month)
  • August 2014: $4.7 million
  • September 2014: $5 million
  • October 2014: $5.5 million
  • November 2014: $6.5 million
  • December 2014: $7.25 million
  • January 2015 – $8.5 million
  • February 2015: $8 million
  • March 2015: $9.3 million
  • April 2015: $9.8 million
  • May 2015: $10.8 million
  • June 2015: $11.3 million
  • July 2015: $11.5 million
  • August 2015: $11.8 million
  • September 2015: $12 million
  • October 2015: $12.4 million
  • November 2015: $12.7 million
  • December 2015: $13.5 million
  • January 2016: $15 million
  • February 2016: $14 million
  • March 2016: $14.9 million
  • April 2016: $14.9 million
  • May 2016: $15.3 million
  • June 2016: $15.4 million
  • July 2016: $15.5 million
  • August 2016: $15.8 million
  • September 2016: $15.9 million
  • October 2016: $16.2 million
  • November 2016: $16.3 million
  • December 2016: $16.8 million
  • January 2017: : $17.8 million
  • February 2017: : $16.8 million
  • March 2017: $17.7 million
  • April 2017: $17.8 million
  • May 2017 :$17.9 million
  • June 2017: $18 million
  • July 2017: $19 million
  • August 2017: $19.4 million

Self-Publisher Bibel

image by ken2754@Yokohama

Offering Bitcoin Rewards for Turning in eBook Pirates, and Other Bad Ideas

Bitcoin and blockchain are the hot new buzzwords in tech, so much so that it is easy to find a double dozen startup using blockchains for the most ridiculous reasons. (For example, Binded/Blockai claims that blockchain can protect creator’s copyrights, even though that’s simply not true.)

Now the blockchain hype has spread into the anti-piracy industry.

Someone has had the bright idea of using bitcoin to pay informants that turn in ebook pirates. From the press release:

Custos Media Technologies has announced its participation in a new blockchain-based anti-piracy solution for ebooks, following the recent news that content protection giant Digimarc and ebook publisher Erudition are joining forces.

This new collaboration debuts the combination of Digimarc Barcode for digital documents and Custos’ infringement detection technology. This provides a more effective, reader-friendly way to
combat ebook piracy.

Erudition and Custos have worked closely together over the past year. The Stellenbosch-based media protection company provides technology that adds Bitcoin deposits to ebooks. These digital bounties enable Custos to rapidly detect piracy after the first copy of a file is shared.

Just so we are on the same page, here is how the process is described:

  • Imperceptible watermarks which do not affect honest users are embedded within eBook files
  • The watermarks contain a bounty which is a Bitcoin private key
  • Anyone with the freely-available extraction tool can decode the watermark and claim the bounty
  • Bitcoin allows the hunter to claim the bounty instantly and anonymously, from anywhere in the world
  • The publisher is immediately alerted the moment the bounty is claimed and the infringing customer (uploader) is uniquely identified

This is clearly one of those ideas that shows that no one really thought it through (see Verrit, Microsoft Tay, or O’Reilly closing its ebookstore for other examples).

The thing about bitcoin is that – in principle – bitcoin wallets are anonymous, and that means you don’t know who is actually getting the money. It could be that an actual informer collected the reward, or the reward could be going to the "pirate’s" buddy who is in on a scheme to get free money from Digimarc and the publisher.

The reward might even be going to the "pirate" who informed on themselves just to get the free money!

There is just no way this could be an effective anti-piracy tool; it is simply too easy for the "pirate" to create a phony identity to buy the ebook, and then collect the reward on themselves.

Not only will the publisher be out of money, they won’t even have anyone to blame.

Next!

image by zcopley

James Patterson’s "The Store" Takes Aim at Amazon, and Misses

When the latest James Patterson-branded book came out last month, it got a lot of press attention for its choice of villain. The Store featured a thinly veiled Amazon as the world’s largest retailer dubbed The Store. It’s set in a time when The Store is the only book publisher and basically controls everything.

This take on Amazon intrigued me enough that I got on the waiting list at my local public library. My turn finally came this morning when I picked up a copy, and I’ve spent part of the day reading The Store.

I’m glad I didn’t spend any money on this book, because it’s not worth reading, much less buying.

The Store reads like a manifesto written by your conspiracy theory uncle after he had been handed a script for an episode from the late-1990s The Outer Limits. (In fact, I’m pretty sure this book has many similarities with a specific story from that series, but I can’t recall the title.)

This book focuses on a couple of Manhattan writers, Jacob and Megan Brandeis, who – for reasons never fully explained – are hired by The Store to work in a Nebraska warehouse. Oh, the writers are out to write a book-length expose on The Store, but it’s never explained why The Store would hire a couple of middle-aged writers for a physically demanding job like stock picker.

Very few of The Store’s  actions are explained in this book; instead they are merely conveyed in a tone intended to keep you afraid without explaining or informing (think the nightly news, only more so).

The company town, New Burg, is ominously uniform in a Stepford Wives sort of way, which I suppose counts as frightening to those who did not grow up in suburbia, but it’s never made clear why The Store would build the town or why the surveillance or company control was made so oppressively obvious.

That’s just in the first twenty or so pages, and that lack of explanation really makes it hard to suspend disbelief for more than a few pages.

What is also hard to believe is how The Store is portrayed both as all-knowing and all-powerful and yet also incompetent.

The Store can see and do anything it wants, including vanishing critics and ex-employees, suppressing evidence of a car accident, and more or less engaging in mid control, and yet The Store was also unable to catch the protagonist, Jacob Brandeis, when he was on the run. It also can’t stop him from publishing the book, holding a press conference, etc.

So this all-powerful The Store can’t hire a hitman, engage in a smear campaign, or fake up some committal documents?

There’s just so much here that doesn’t add up, including the conclusion.

In the end Brandeis publishes his book, and so he has won, but The Store still exists and it continues to operate. It hasn’t been vanquished or defeated.

How is that a victory, exactly?

O O O

Don’t read this book. Patterson’s book isn’t worth the bother because one, it’s just not that good, and two, the same concept has been done many times before, in depth, with nuance, by better writers.

Instead of The Store, you could read any of several nonfiction books about Amazon.

Or, if you want to read about out of control consumerism, Frederick Pohl wrote a couple books titled The Space Merchants (Amazon, Wikipedia) and The Merchant’s War (Amazon, Wikipedia). They are not available as ebooks but they are worth reading.

Or, if you want to read about companies taking away user rights, try Richard Stallman’s dystopian The Right to Read (it’s free).

Or if you want a chilling and plausible tale of a tech company gaining control through spying on everything you do, try Cory Doctorow’s Scroogled (also free). I can also recommend the about half of his nonfiction that touches on the same issues (Content would be a good place to start).

There is a long list of works that are more worth your time than this book (including, in my opinion, dinosaur erotica).

image by hnnbz

reader clears the FCC

A new Slick-branded e-reader from Southern Telecom recently appeared in FCC filings, indicating an upcoming release. While the specific launch date and retail price remain unconfirmed for the model, designated as the ER-701, several technical details have emerged from the documentation.

The ER-701 features a 7-inch display, matching the screen size of the brand’s previous models. Hardware specifications include a microSD card slot for expandable memory, though the internal flash storage capacity has not been specified. While early analysis suggested the inclusion of Wi-Fi—which would typically allow for web browsing and access to the integrated Kobo bookstore—subsequent updates to the report clarify that the device actually lacks wireless connectivity. Consequently, users will likely need to manage their libraries via a wired connection.

The device’s interface and internal design appear to originate from Gajah, a developer known for producing hardware for various brands like Elonex. Initial reports attributed the device’s performance to a Rockchip processor; however, a closer inspection of similar models suggests the ER-701 may utilize a BoxChip CPU instead. Multimedia capabilities, including ebook rendering and audio/video playback, are expected to be functional but basic, consistent with other budget-friendly devices sharing this architecture.

The physical design of the ER-701 includes a directional pad and dedicated buttons for navigation and page turns. Because the device lacks a touchscreen, manual navigation will be the primary method of interaction. Recent updates from Southern Telecom indicate that the ER-701 is scheduled for a December 2011 release. There is currently no information regarding the status of other e-reader prototypes previously showcased by the company at CES 2011.

Publishers Are Now Shedding Best-Selling Authors

We’re just over two months out from the Kindle’s tenth anniversary, and while the mainstream media is saying that print is making a resurgence and everything is just dandy, Kris Rusch has just given us a snapshot of just how much the book market has changed in the past decade.

Poking around through old last week, I found some predictions I had forgotten about. I wrote, in 2013, both in unfinished and finished blogs that it would take years for traditionally published writers to realize the world they’d been writing in was long gone. I could see that moment coming, as contracts ended, and new contracts started up.

What I didn’t foresee, and should have, was that traditional publishers would cut so many major bestsellers from their lists. Writers who made lots of money for the company had sales declines, just like everyone else.

Rather than negotiate a new contract, their publishers (particularly Penguin Random House) would stall and no longer answer queries about a new deal. Often these writers got new editors (several) along the way, and the new editors wouldn’t return phone calls to writers or their agents.

It was rejection by silence, the most nasty product of the new marketplace. Some editors would have the guts to tell their writers that any deal wouldn’t be to their liking. And some editors, off the record, would say that no deal was forthcoming.

Not until the writer or the agent pressed did the writer find out that their bestselling career had come to an end.

Now, most of these writers were not major bestsellers. These writers were making consistent six-figure incomes every year, not seven-figure incomes. Their books were selling well, until the entire industry upended itself, and rather than invest in a known product, their publishers threw these writers under the bus.

On this day in 2007, the only way to make a lot of money from writing books was to get an agent and sell to major publishers in a process that bore a striking resemblance to a lottery – one with very few winners.

Then Amazon launched the Kindle Store, giving authors a way to bypass the gatekeepers and reach the market. As a result the market fragmented as many more books were released each year. Existing authors have seen their sales fall due to the increased competition, with mega best-sellers like John Grisham seeing their sales cut in half.

Indie authors sold more books while legacy publishers sold fewer books, and as a result the publishers have dropped under-performing authors.

Legacy publishers have been shedding mid-list authors for many years now, but now Rusch says that best-selling authors are also getting cut.

Remember this the next time you read somewhere in the mainstream media that ebooks are dead, because most of those sales lost by trad-pub authors are being made up elsewhere in the form of ebooks.

And yes, those sales are going digital; indie authors simply cannot access the print market nearly as well as they can sell ebooks. The main way for indie authors to reach print readers is POD, a process that results in expensive books (they’re printed one at a time).

So those authors are going digital as a matter of necessity – it’s where they can make money – and readers are clearly following.

Doesn’t this almost make you question the surveys showing an alleged preference for print?

It makes me wonder, because this print-lovers clearly aren’t buying as many books as they used to.

Where have they gone?

image by Joelk75

AAP Reports Publisher Revenue Up, eBook Revenue Down in First Four Months of 2017

The Association of American Publishers released their revenue report for the first third of the year, and it’s the same old news, only with a different numbers.

Overall revenues were up slightly, trade revenues were flat, and ebook revenues were down.

The AAP reported total revenues were up 4.2% for the first four months of 2017, to $3.10 billion. Buoyed by adult and religious presses, trade revenues increased by $6 million (0.3%), to $2.02 billion. The kids segment fell by 3.6%.

revenues form hardback sales rose 8.6%, to $679.1 million. Paperback sales dropped 6.8%, to $755 million. The strong growth of audiobook downloads continued, with, publisher revenue for this format jumping by 29.6%, to $100.6 million in in the first four months of 2017.

eBooks revenues, on the other hand, fell 4.6% to $374.9 million.

press release:

Revenues for book publishers were $3.10 billion for the first four months of 2017, a 4.2% increase over same timeframe in 2016, according to the StatShot Monthly report from Association of American Publishers (AAP). Much of the growth is attributed to increased revenue in higher education course materials, but Adult Books, Religious Presses and Professional Books all saw revenue increases as well.

The strong growth of downloaded audio continued in April (34.4%) and from Jan. to April (29.6%). During that time, publisher revenue for this format jumped from $77.6 million in 2016 to $100.6 million in 2017.

StatShot tracks publisher revenue on a monthly basis for about 1,200 publishers of trade (fiction/non-fiction/religious), PreK-12 instructional materials, higher education course materials, university presses and professional books.

Trade Books

Through April 2017, revenues for trade books were flat at $2.02 billion, up $6 million (0.3%) compared to the first four months of 2016. Adult Books and Religious Presses saw increased revenues and Children & Young Adult Books saw declines.

Total Trade Net Revenue by Category (in millions)*

Jan. – April 2017 Jan. – April 2016 Percent Change
Adult Fiction/Non-Fiction

$1,388.6

$1,370.4

+1.3%

Children’s/YA

$495.1

$513.4

-3.6%

Religious Presses

$131.5

$125.8

+4.5%

Total Trade

$2,015.3

$2,009.6

+0.3%

Trade Book Formats

The greatest percentage growth of publisher revenue remains downloaded audio, up 29.6% through April 2017 vs. the same four months in 2016. Revenue for print books was flat, with strong growth in hardback books and declines in paperback and mass market.

Total Trade Net Revenue by Format (in millions)*

Jan. – April 2017 Jan. – April 2016 Percent Change
eBooks

$374.9

$392.9

-4.6%

Hardback

$679.1

$625.5

+8.6%

Paperback & Mass Market

$755.0

$810.3

-6.8%

Downloaded Audio

$100.6

$77.6

+29.6%

Other (physical audio, board book)

$105.7

$103.2

+2.4%

Education and Scholarly Publishing

Higher education publishers saw strong revenue growth the first four months of the year, up 28.5% compared to the first four months of 2016. While the growth was impressive, Jan. – April represents a small portion of annual revenue, as most revenue for HigherEd is captured in July and December, just ahead of the Fall and Spring semesters.

Revenues for PreK-12 instructional materials declined 1.3% from Jan. – April 2017 vs. the same time in 2016.

Professional Books saw a 4.2% increase and University Press revenues were down 0.7% compared to the first four months of 2016.

Note: * All figures represent publishers’ net revenue from all distribution channels (these are not retailer/consumer sales figures).

Kindle Firmware Update 5.10.3 Enhances Page Turn Speeds, eBook Open Times

Amazon recently released firmware version 5.10.3 for its Kindle e-readers. While the company provided almost no official details regarding the contents of the update—omitting even the standard "performance enhancements" note—reports from the user community suggest substantial improvements.

According to discussions on the MobileRead forums, Kindle owners are seeing significant gains in speed. Specifically, users have reported that books open much faster than before and that the response time for turning pages has been noticeably shortened. These observations have been echoed by readers across social media, who confirm that the device’s overall responsiveness feels snappier.

The 5.10.3 update is available for a wide range of Kindle hardware. This includes the current generation of devices, the Voyage, and the older entry-level Kindle. Compatibility research indicates that nearly every model released since the second-generation Kindle Paperwhite is eligible for this software refresh.

As is standard with Amazon’s rollout strategy, the update will be delivered automatically over the air to devices over the coming months. Kindle owners who prefer not to wait for the automatic download can visit the Amazon website to download the firmware file manually and install it via a computer.

The Digital Reader, which first highlighted these undocumented changes, notes that while Amazon is often vague about minor software revisions, the tangible performance boost makes this a significant update for those using older or modern hardware. Though some users have reported minor technical hurdles, such as Windows 10 connectivity issues following the update, the general consensus remains positive regarding the increased operational speed.

Children Turn Their Backs on eBooks as 'Screen Fatigue' Takes Hold, And Other Fictions

As I am sure many people know, The Guardian takes every opportunity – and sometimes invents those opportunities – to proclaim that ebooks are dying and print books are killing them off.

For example, back in April and May The Guardian misinterpreted UK Publisher Association annual revenue stats no less than four times in just over two weeks in order to proclaim that ebooks were over. (No, I’m not kidding.)

Now The Guardian is back again to once again beat the "ebooks are dead" drum. They are using those same revenue stats from April to claim that kids are choosing print books over ebooks.

One thing is certain: in troubled times the nation’s reading habits have become a lightning rod for parental pessimism about video games and the end of civilisation as we know it. There is, however, a silver lining to these clouds.

This week, as Britain’s schoolchildren creep like snails back to the classroom, fretful parents can take heart from statistics that demonstrate a mini-boom in juvenile reading. In 2016, for example, sales of children’s titles rose 16% to £365m, an increase attributable to the buying of printed books.

Forget the merchants of doom. According to The Bookseller: “Children are now reading more and want to read print.” This is confirmed by the Publishers Association, which recently reported that book sales for the previous year had jumped 7% to £4.8bn, and data suggests that this has been driven by that whopping 16% jump in revenues from children’s publishing.

More significant still, as e-book sales fell by 3%, the Guardian noted that “Britons are abandoning the e-book at an alarming rate, as ‘screen fatigue’ helped fuel a five-year high in printed book sales.” Moreover, for the first time since records began, nearly £1 in every £4 spent on print titles is on a children’s book, a market share of 24%.

There are a couple important details that the Guardian conveniently left out of their story, and they paint a very different picture.

For starters, the sales stats cited by the Guardian do not reflect the entire UK book market. As I have previously reported, the PA is only tracking about 62% of ebook sales in 2016, and so to claim that "ebook sales fell by 3%" is misleading at best, and arguably a falsehood.

I have made that point so many times that I am getting tired of the sound of my own keyboard, so I will not reiterate the point here.

Edit: And as I have pointed out in another post, screen fatigue is a myth that doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.

Instead, let us consider the fundamental flaw in this article. This piece is based on the premise that "kids are choosing print".

The problem with the idea that kids book sales reflect kids preferences is that most kids books aren’t bought by kids. They’re bought by adults for kids, so you can point to sales stats as evidence of a preference.

But wait, there’s more.

The Guardian was so desperate to report that ebooks were dead that not only did they use questionable logic, they also didn’t bother to spend 3 minutes on Google to find the survey data that might actually prove their point.

In January Scholastic and Yougov released a report that showed that kids do prefer prefer print over ebooks. It doesn’t indicate an increase in the preference, however, and it also includes a factoid that effectively demolishes the Guardian’s entire premise:

If you can’t read the above image, it says:

75% of parents with kids ages 6-17 agree: "I wish my child would do more things that did not involve screen time"

What types of books do you suppose those parents are buying for their kids? print? digital?

They’re buying print, obviously, and that, in a nut shell, is why you can’t trust sales stats to indicate kids preference for print versus digital.

B&N’s New Plan to Save Itself is … (Wait For It) … to Sell More Stuff

Yesterday Barnes & Noble announced the umpteenth bad quarterly report, with revenues declining 6.6% overall and digital revenues falling 28%.

But don’t worry, because B&N has a plan to turn around the company, one that is bound to earn them a trip to Stockholm to collect a Nobel prize.

Barnes & Noble CEO Demos Parneros announced on the investor call yesterday afternoon that B&N is going to open more stores and sell more stuff.

As we look to reinvent our customer value proposition and growth sales, we’re focused on a number of initiatives to increase the value customers derive from shopping at Barnes & Noble. Our value proposition is comprised of membership, convenience, digital offerings and most importantly our stores where customers come to browse, discover, and interact with 26,000 knowledgeable booksellers.

Pricing is a key consideration and over the past few months, we’ve launched a number of price tests tied to our membership program to see which authors resonate best with customers and increase the overall value of the program. Our goals are to increase enrollment, conversion and visit frequency.

Beyond pricing, we’re also focused on growing sales by improving the overall shopping, browsing and discovery experience for better visual merchandizing and signage as well as personalized recommendations. This includes testing changes to existing store layouts and remerchandising certain businesses. We believe there are significant opportunities to manage our inventory better, increasing trends and reduce unproductive merchandize.

As part of our efforts to better understand customers and develop a robust data analytics program, we’ve recently installed customer counters in all our stores and reintroduced mystery shops. We plan to enhance customer engagement and personalization through improved customer insights. And recently we’ve established an analytics team building the foundation for better analytic rigor.

Stores are an integral component of our value proposition and recently we made a few critical hires to oversee our store growth initiatives. Carl Hauch has joined as Vice President of Stores and will oversee the entire retail store organization and profitable growth of the business. Jim Lampassi has also joined the leadership team as Vice President of Real Estate Development and is responsible for developing and executing our real estate strategy. I’m excited to have Carl and Jim join our team.

In addition to the two new test stores we have in the pipeline, we are reviewing our entire portfolio in identifying opportunities to open new stores in new markets as well as opportunities to relocate stores as their leases expire instead of simply vacating markets. Our goal is to position the company for net store expansion.

Barnes & Noble has hit upon the previously undiscovered secret to turning a retail business around. They’re going to sell more stuff.

… [clipped] 500 words of mocking B&N …

Folks, I may sneer at B&N but the simple fact is if they actually knew how to increase sales then their revenues last quarter would have held steady (at least).

If B&N actually knew how to do better then they would not have consistently reported declining sales over the past several years. So when they say that they will increase sales, they are less stating a goal than confirming that they are the underpants gnomes of retail.

Like the underpants gnomes of South Park, Barnes & Noble knows what they want to accomplish but they have absolutely no clue on how to achieve that goal.

It doesn’t matter how many CEOs they hire and fire, nor how many new VPs play the game of musical chairs. As an institution, B&N is incapable of solving the most basic of problems: how not to go out of business.

 

Amazon Files for Arbitration Against Authors, Publishers for Scamming the Kindle Store

Do you know all those articles David Gaughran has been writing about scammers gaming their way on to the Kindle best-seller lists?

Judging by David’s tweets, Amazon has not been successful in taking direct action in cleaning up the Kindle Store, but now they are pulling out the big guns.

Geekwire reports that Amazon has filed arbitration demands against a number of companies and authors:

Amazon has filed arbitration demands against several book authors, publishers and marketers, alleging that they abused the Kindle Direct Publishing system to artificially inflate their profits and sales rankings.

The five arbitration demands, filed Wednesday with the American Arbitration Association, make a variety of allegations, including fraudulent customer reviews, the creation of fake user accounts and other schemes to increase rankings and royalties on the company’s self-publishing platform for e-books.

One of the demands, for example, alleges that a man from the Philippines offered a service to authors to boost the number of pages read in their books using hundreds of fake Amazon customer accounts, in exchange for a 40 percent cut of their profits. Amazon pays authors who participate in the Kindle Unlimited and Kindle Owners’ Lending Library program using a formula based on pages read.

…

The company is seeking injunctions preventing the authors and publishers from continuing the alleged activity, as well as attorney’s fees and financial damages to be determined through arbitration.

You can find the filings on Scribd:

The thing about arbitration is that it is as binding as a court ruling, only without the numerous rounds pre-trial motions and post-trial appeals, so Amazon will likely secure decisions against these parties fairly quickly. (Obviously, enforcing the decisions is another matter entirely.)

Various kinds of scams (as opposed to garden variety fraud and copyright infringement) have been plaguing the Kindle Store since shortly after the launch of Kindle Unlimited. Amazon fought the scammers by changing the best-seller algorithm and payment system for Kindle Unlimited several times, but the scammers were always one step ahead.

And now Amazon has triggered the nuclear option.

This is the first time Amazon has taken legal action against Kindle Store scammers, but in the past it has filed numerous lawsuits against sellers of fake reviews while at the same time removing whole swathes of reviews.

Let’s hope the rounds of arbitration is more successful than the fight against fake reviews (I’m still finding them.)

image by Joe Gratz

B&N Revenues Declined 6.6% in the First Quarter, Nook Revenues Dropped 29%

Following only days after someone said that B&N Nook and ebook sales are on the rise, Barnes & Noble has revealed that its digital revenues have declined for the umpteenth straight quarter.

Total company revenues fell 6.6% to $853 million, while Nook revenues fell 28.1%, to $29.5 million. That is literally the lowest Nook revenues ever recorded.

Nevertheless, there was some small good news: B&N also reported that the Nook division turned a small profit with an EBITA of $617 thousand. But it’s hard to tell if that is actual profit given that B&N also recorded an operating loss on Nook of $2.7 million.

Due to the accounting slight of hand, the only figure we can trust is the gross revenue.

Press release:

B&N today reported sales and earnings for its fiscal 2018 first quarter ended July 29, 2017.

Total sales for the first quarter were $853 million, declining 6.6% as compared to the prior year. Comparable store sales decreased 4.9%, as declines in non-book categories outpaced improved book trends during the quarter. The Company also experienced lower online and NOOK® sales during the quarter, which were impacted by the prior year eBook settlement and lower promotional activity.

The consolidated first quarter net loss improved to $10.8 million, or $0.15 per share, compared to a loss of $14.4 million, or $0.20 per share, in the prior year.

The consolidated first quarter operating loss of $15.2 million improved $6.2 million versus the prior year. Retail incurred an operating loss of $12.5 million, while NOOK incurred an operating loss of $2.7 million.

Consolidated first quarter EBITDA was $11.2 million, as compared to $9.6 million a year ago. NOOK generated EBITDA of $0.6 million, an $8.6 million improvement over the prior year on expense reductions. Retail EBITDA of $10.6 million decreased $7.0 million primarily due to the comparable store sales decline, somewhat mitigated by expense reductions.

"Our first quarter earnings results improved over the prior year, as we were able to mitigate the sales decline through expense reductions," said Demos Parneros, Chief Executive Officer of Barnes & Noble, Inc. "We expect to improve our performance in the back-half of the year, which coupled with our focus on expense reduction, will enable us to achieve EBITDA of $180 million."

Outlook

For fiscal year 2018, the Company continues to expect comparable bookstore sales to decline in the low single digits and full year consolidated EBITDA to be approximately $180 million.

 

image by paurian

Kobo Enters Audiobook Market, Offers $10 a Month Subscription

Several years ago I speculated Kobo would one day carry audiobooks, and now, through sheer chance and completely unrelated business decisions, it has come to pass.

Kobo is now selling audiobooks alongside ebooks. You can either buy single titles or subscribe for a flat monthly fee and get one title a month.

Rakuten Kobo today uncovers another dimension of storytelling, adding audiobooks to the Kobo experience and offering booklovers the opportunity to experience the joy of being told a story.

Readers can choose audiobooks from across all genres, including bestsellers such as Into the Water by Paula Hawkins, Truly Madly Guilty by Lianne Moriarty, and the Harry Potter series; with new titles added weekly.

At just $12.99/month and with a 30-day free trial period, Kobo offers the best value on a subscription plan in the category. Customers can redeem their monthly credit for any audiobook at Kobo.com, even if its list price is higher; those with a subscription also have the option to purchase a three-pack of credits for $38.99 (up to 24 credits per account). Audiobooks can also be purchased à la carte. In addition, readers earn Kobo Super Points on their monthly subscription fees or audiobook purchases, and can shop with confidence with the backing of Kobo’s Price Match Guarantee. The Kobo audiobooks service is available in the US ($9.99/mo), the UK (£6.99/mo), Australia ($12.99/mo), and New Zealand ($13.99/mo).

The audiobooks are supplied by OverDrive, and can be listened to in the Kobo apps for iOS and Android. Those apps were updated today.

Kobo is pricing their subscription for less than Audible, which costs £( in the UK and $15 in the US. That’s going to make the plan very appealing to the cost conscious – if they can get it.

A question for readers: can you get that subscription outside of the five markets mentioned?