Skip to main content

Nate Hoffelder

Nate Hoffelder

Hachette Joins the "I Hate Libraries" Club – Now Raising eBook prices Through the Roof

It’s been some 6 months since the last time the major publishers issued an assault on library ebooks, and today fired another salvo.

Overdrive sent out an email today to their library partners with the sad news that Hachette was raising the wholesale price of ebooks. While this increase won’t be as bad as the one Random House handed out earlier this year, but it’s still going to be painful:

Dear Library Partner,

Hachette will be raising its eBook prices on October 1, 2012 on their currently available eBook catalog (~3,500 eBook titles with release dates of April 2010 and earlier). On average prices will increase 220%.

Orders for Hachette eBook titles at current pricing must be submitted in Content Reserve by 11:59 pm US Eastern Time on Sunday, September 30, 2012. This includes any orders that are currently in your Content Reserve work queue as well as new orders created during the remainder of the month. Any orders with Hachette eBook content left in your work queue and submitted after September 30th will be processed under the new pricing.

Effective October 1, 2012, the new prices will be reflected in Content Reserve.

Regards,

OverDrive Collection Development Team

Hachette used to be one of the bright lights in library ebooks because they charged the regular retail price for their ebooks. And even though they wouldn’t sell their front list titles to libraries, at least we knew the titles would eventually be available. Only now those titles will be terribly expensive.

So the current state of the library ebook market is this:

  • 2 major publishers which charge high prices (Hachette, Random House)
  • 2 major publishers which won’t sell at all (Macmillan, Simon & Schuster)
  • Penguin, which is only selling ebooks to ibraries grudgingly and with support for the Kindle explicitly blocked
  • HarperCollins, which imposed a 26 checkout limit for library ebooks

And of course there are the many other publishers who sell ebooks and other digital content to libraries. Those 6  titans are not the whole of the ebook market, and it’s important to keep that fact in mind. And thanks to their non-presence in the library ebook market, they’re not even a majority of that market.

via

image by (vincent desjardins)

Unglue.it Finishes Ungluing Its First Book

It’s not exactly a secret that I’ve been somewhat skeptical of Unglue.it’s selections and model for soliciting crowdfunding to unlock various e-book titles into free Creative Commons release. Most of its titles didn’t seem well-enough known to attract many people, and were generally already available inexpensively enough as e-books that most people would be more likely to buy the e-book to read for themselves than to kick in so everyone could read it free. And the recent cancellation of its payment processing by Amazon seems to have necessarily put its plans on hold for a while.

That being said, Unglue.it did hit one big success early on, when it was able to crowdfund the release of a 1970 non-fiction book, Oral Literature in Africa by Ruth H. Finnegan. This book had a funding goal of $7,500, which it met with the help of 291 donors, and work proceeded apace to “unglue” the book into free public release under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. This means that the work may be used for any purpose, including commercially, as long as the new use is careful to make clear where it got the original material. Today, Unglue.it made that e-book available for free download in Mobipocket (Kindle), EPUB, and PDF formats.

Needless to say, this is quite a great accomplishment. The book had been out of print for decades and fetching high used prices on Amazon. The sorts of people who would have wanted to have it available would have had quite a lot of incentive to donate—for example, college professors who wanted to use it in their courses, or academics and students of Africa, oral traditions, and related matters. And people are accustomed to paying more for scholarly nonfiction works like this anyway—just look at how much college textbooks cost these days.

All in all, it’s not too surprising that the sort of people who would have wanted it free would have wanted it enough to make it happen. I would go so far as to say that even if Unglue.it never “unglued” another book, it will still be fondly remembered for this—at least in certain academic circles.

The only puzzling thing to me is why Unglue.it didn’t try to do more projects like this one. I’m sure there must be other academic books out there that are just as highly sought-after, and whose authors might be just as amenable to taking part in such a project. There might even have been some donors who crossed over from one project to another, deeming both academic nonfiction books to be equally worth supporting.

But apart from this one, all or most of Unglue.it’s books (in the original batch, anyway) tended to be self-published or indie-press published fiction—with completely different demand profiles. Not only were these not in as much demand as an out-of-print academic work, but there wouldn’t have been much crossover between people wanting to support a scholarly treatise on African folklore and people who would be inclined to support freeing some random self-published fantasy novel.

Anyway, I’ve downloaded the book and glanced through it. It’s not exactly the sort of thing I’d choose for light reading, but it seems to be very professionally formatted, with footnotes, black and white and color photos (lots of photos—the EPUB file clocks in at 5 megabytes), and block quotes. If I were to want to read a book about the oral literature of Africa, this is exactly the sort of book I would want to read. If this is a sample of the quality Unglue.it will bring to the table, then I certainly hope that Unglue.it can get past its payment processor snafus and is able to unglue many more books.

If Unglue.it is able to get back on track, I’d suggest it might want to learn from its success as well as its failure. If it wants to build a name for itself based on successful projects, it ought to choose more of the kinds of projects that are likely to be successful. Once it gets a reputation for succeeding, then is the time to branch out and take chances.

Apple Doesn’t Want You to Learn About Things Like P***s and V*****s

Do you remember how at one point Apple was censoring the word Jailbreak  from book and song titles and how they’ve banned some books because of a mention of Amazon? Apple’s back at it again, only this time the results are hilariously juvenile.

Mike Cane tipped me to a new censorship regime in iTunes, iBooks, and basically all of Apple’s content stores. Apple, out of the deep concern for the sensitive virgin eyes of some readers, is now using asterisks to hide certain words when they show up in titles. So far as I know Apple is only blocking two words.

I don’t want to offend anyone with these words, so I’ll just share this screenshot and let you draw you own conclusion:

What’s particularly amusing is that  Apple also sells textbooks, including books on human anatomy. And they also sell erotica, some with quite explicit covers.  So really I’m not bothered by the censorship so much as I am amused by how inept Apple is at coming up with a policy and enforcing it. The very concept of bleeping out these 2 words is making me laugh so hard that I have trouble typing right now, and yet Apple still decided to do so.

I used to smack around Amazon because they have banned certain types of manga while continuing to sell explicit erotica, but I think Apple’s policy is worse. They’ll sell you the content but they don’t want to let you know what the word is.

Tell me, has anyone bought one of thee ebooks? I’m wondering if Apple also removed those words from the iBooks dictionary. I know that sounds strange, but it’s not impossible. Does anyone know?

Author Threatens to Sue Book Reviewers over Trademark Infringement

For those who have not read The Onion today, I have your daily dose of crazy all ready for you.

Jazan Wild, a comics creator who is most well known for suing NBC in 2010 for $60 million over copyright infringement, is now pursuing a different lawsuit against HarperCollins. Wild is claiming that one recent HC title, Carnival of Souls by Melissa Marr, infringes upon his trademark.

Not copyright – trademark.

Wild is claiming that HarperCollins is using the trademarked phrase as the title of a book to intentionally confuse readers into thinking that a fantasy novel which was published last week was related to a comics series which Wild had published in 2006.

Crazy, right?  Any sane person would have put a few minutes thought into the matter and realized that such an obvious phrase as Carnival of Souls would likely have been used as a title many times before. In fact, Bookfinder turned up at least a couple dozen different books, movies, TV episodes, and more – some of which dates back to 1962. And if you look inside books, Google says that it found the phrase no less than 5600 times (with some duplication, obviously).

But that’s not the end of the craziness. No, it’s with the book reviewers that the crazy truly begins.

Wild is now sending cease and desist letters to any book reviewer who has mentioned or posted an excerpt from the new novel. He’s accusing them of trademark infringement.

The Bookalicious blog posted a copy of an email they got from Wild today. This blog posted a review of the new novel, not an excerpt, and Wild is freaking out over the fact that they mention the title of the book:

To whom it may concern,

This is a cease and desist. “Carnival Of Souls” is a trademark owned by Jazan Wild and Wild alone has the exclusive right on the United States of America to use the mark in classes 16 and 41 of which a novel is included. Posting a chapter from a novel using this mark is a willful and malicious infringement of Wild’s mark. Please remove.

The Trademark Infringement:
http://bookalicious.org/2012/09/review-carnival-of-souls-by-melissa-marr/

The guy also shows up in the comments thread following that notice to continue the craziness. For a raving lunatic he is quite a nice person.

I probably don’t have to say this but:

Authors, don’t be this guy. First, don’t file frivolous nonsensical lawsuits but most importantly don’t threaten book bloggers. One threat sent to one blog and everyone is going to know about it. The book community is large but juicy stories like this will spread fast.

In the past I’ve pointed to the Lendink lynch mob as an example of how not to react to piracy, and one of my recommendations was to figure out who to ask for advice.  I’ve already pointed out a couple law blogs, so let me add a third source.  Dear Author is a book review blog run by a lawyer, Jane Litte. In addition to the book reviews each week she posts on a legal topic relevant to authors. I’m going to pass this along to her and see if she thinks it’s worth explaining just how crazy this guy is.

via Bookalicious

image by mlcastle

New Update for the K3/Kindle Keyboard Shows Amazon Still Loves The Older Kindle

For the longest time now Amazon has been releasing updates for their apps, new Kindles, and the Kindle Fire while sadly neglecting the now 2 year old K3.  This ereader didn’t die last year when Amazon released the newer models, but was instead kept around as the Kindle Keyboard. But that was about all Amazon did as they turned attention to the newer gadgets. Today that changes.

Amazon has rolled out a new update for the K3 which gives it all the latest features. If you’ve been holding on to your old device, today you get rewarded.

The K3 now supports the KF8 ebook format, which offers near Epub quality of formatting. (Dropcaps, wrapped images, and embedded fonts, oh my!) And this update adds support for the Kindle fixed layout format. Now you can read the digital comics, children’s books, and magazine titles introduced with the Kindle Fire last fall.

This update also adds the parental controls features which Jeff talked about so much last week. Parents can now restrict access to the web browser, Kindle Store, or Archived Items. Even if you’re not a parent, I’m sure you can appreciate not having to worry about some fool buying stuff on your Amazon account.

And the K3 also now can support Whispersync for voice. Now you can switch back and forth between reading and listening without losing your place. Whispersync for voice will sync your reading position on any Kindle with Audible playback on Kindle Keyboard, Kindle Fire, or in Audible apps for iPhone and Android. Of course, you have to buy both the ebook and audiobook, so there is a downside. But this is still going to be a fun feature.

Last but not least, the K3 also gets the improved fonts which rolled out to the K4 back in June. That’s the one that has been improved to have more contrast and be more crisp.

There’s a lot to take in, so much so that I almost didn’t notice that the K3 still lacks X-Ray. And I’m also half expecting that this update will take away the free web browsing over 3G. But I don’t have a K3 handy to test so I will have to wait for user feedback.

Where Will E-Book Prices Go After the Settlement?

Say what you will about Bob Kohn, he’s certainly persistent. PaidContent reports that he’s filed a last-minute request for a stay on Judge Cote’s ruling that the Department of Justice’s Agency Pricing settlement can go into effect. He wants the imposition of the settlement suspended until the Second Circuit appeals court can rule on it. If the appeal is rejected—as it probably will be—then that will go to the Second Circuit. And if it strikes out there, too, then the fat lady will have officially sung, because by the time the appeals court gets around to ruling on the settlement itself the market will already have been changed by months of new e-book prices.

I suspect that, with Amazon starting to cut prices on settling publishers’ e-books, it’s already too late. A more interesting question is what the settlement will mean in terms of overall e-book prices. Will the publishers still using agency pending the DoJ lawsuit lower their own prices to compete with the settling publishers? Might publishers even raise prices on some of their e-books, to “use up” allotted retailer discounts more quickly?

In his most recent blog post, Mike Shatzkin gives the devil his due, noting that Amazon has done a remarkably good job of synergizing a lot of its different properties and capabilities together for new features in its new family of Kindle products. Of particular note are the abilities to synchronize or pair the e-book and audiobook versions of a book—which will not only make both more useful, but will also induce consumers to make two purchases instead of one.

He also thinks Amazon will discount aggressively, using “bots and algorithms”, those e-books covered by the settlement—and that Apple lacks the expertise to match them at that game. (This is a bit interesting given that Nate thinks that, with its newly-cheap ereader hardware, Amazon won’t be doing that sort of aggressive discounting. I wonder who’s right?)

At any rate, our times just got more interesting. I can’t wait to see what Amazon does next.

Image by cliff1066.

Apple, Amazon Now Cutting Prices on Ex-Agency eBooks & B&N is Matching the Cuts

It’s only been 4 days since Judge Cote approved the anti-trust settlement between the 3 publishers and the Dept of Justice and it looks like Amazon has wasted no time in cutting prices.

There are reports on Twitter that HarperCollins titles are no longer showing the all important "This price was set by the publisher" note. Now there are quite a few books which instead say that is simply by HarperCollins. Jane Litte of Dear Author was the first to comment on the change, and she posted this screen shot which compared a Penguin title and an HC title:

There’s no sign yet that Amazon has signed deals with other publishers, but I can report that HC titles appear to have gotten an across the board price cut. There’s a fair number of $9.99 ebooks now selling for $8.02, and there’s also quite a few $13.99 titles now selling for $10.94. There’s also a handful of other HC titles with different discounts, so there does not seem to be a pattern. Nor does this does not include all titles, but nearly all the HC ebooks I checked in the Kindle Store have gotten a price cut. The rest might just be waiting for Amazon’s servers to get around to them.

So Amazon is cutting prices. That comes as no surprise, but what I do find interesting is that B&N appears to be matching those price cuts as soon as they happen. B&N is also dropping prices, and of the 8 HC ebooks currently in my browser, B&N has only 1 which costs more than the Amazon price. And that could change at any moment.

Update: And they’re not alone. One reader has told me that BooksonBoard has sent out an email today to announced a sale on HarperCollins titles. BoB is offering 24% off all (most?) HC titles. The sale is going to run this week.

Second Update: A reader pointed me at the iBookstore, where Harpercollins titles are now being discounted. I’ve spot checked a half dozen titles and whenever Apple discounted them Apple was the one who usually had the best price – sometimes by several dollars. For example, the Kindle edition of Men are from Mars sells for $8.89, while B&N has it for $9.99 and Apple sells it for $7.99. And it’s not the only one, either.

Final Update: It’s Tuesday morning, and the prices are now showing up at Kobo as well.

The settlement required the publishers to cancel their existing contracts and start negotiating new ones. It only took Amazon 4 days to start the discounts that will bring about the end of publishing, so I have to wonder whether they had a new contract with Harper Collins worked out in advance. That could be true, but it would not explain how B&N responded with similar speed.The settlement also blocked publishers from controlling the retail price of ebooks for the next couple years, and they also can’t sign a contract which specifies a most favored nation clause.

That last condition is potentially a good one for everyone but Amazon; it gives publishers the option of selling to different ebookstores at different prices.  They could p[ossibly set the Amazon price higher than elsewhere in order to slow down the doom they probably see coming. On the other hand, it also opens up the possibility that Amazon might get the lower price.

And we might already see the effect of the end of the MFN clause. BooksonBoard has discounted HC titles enough that some prices are below that of  Amazon. It would not surprise me to learn that they cut a special deal with HarperCollins.

P.S. I’ve just double checked and it does not appear that Hachette (test title) or S&S (test title) have signed a new deal with Amazon or B&N, but that is liable to change at any time. The only evidence I have one way or another is the price listings, and that’s subject to error.

image by Akira Ohgaki

Amazon Will let You Pay $15 to Opt Out of the Adverts on the Kindle Fire HD

Amazon has just announced that they’re pulling back on the one of the less well received new features for the new Kindle Fire.

You’ve probably heard in the past couple days that Amazon had planned to inflict ads upon all owners of the new Kindle Fire HD Android tablets. I have some good news and bad news. You don’t have to see the ads, but it’s going to cost you $15 to get rid of them (according to TechCrunch). Here’s what an Amazon spokesman said:

We know from our Kindle reader line that customers love our special offers and very few people choose to opt out. We’re happy to offer customers the choice.

Well this was a short-lived story.

So, do you think the $214 Kindle Fire HD is as good of a value as it was when that same tablet cost $199?

Amazon’s Other 2 New Kindle Fire Tablets Clear the FCC – 4G Model Confirmed for Canada

A couple days ago I was caught flat footed. I predicted we’d see a new the Paperwhite Kindles as well as a new Kindle Fire. Instead we saw 3 new Kindle Fires (including a replacement for the original) as well as the paperwhite Kindles.

My face was red on Thursday because i disbelieved the 4G rumor and the multiple Kindle fire rumor, but in my defense I didn’t have any evidence to support the rumors. The thing is, 2 of those new Kindle Fire tablets had not yet cleared the FCC.

The paperwork only showed up Thursday afternoon, which means the story going around about the 4G model not having FCC approval is clearly not true.

Like the last several Amazon devices (here, here, here), these 2 filings only probably belong to Amazon. The paperwork has all the interesting details concealed (internal and external photos) and leads back to the same front company (CSC) as before (but 2 new addresses), so I’m guessing that they belong to Amazon.

At this point the FCC paperwork is really not much more than a footnote, but I’m making the note so I remember to go back and look at the guts once the concealed docs are released. Of course, that won’t happen until March and by then someone will have bought and stripped the tablets for all to see.

One of the filings is for a tablet with Wifi and Blueooth, while the other appears to belong to the 4g LTE model (it has a whole mess of frequencies it was tested for, including LTE) and that model also has an IC ID, meaning it has been passed by the Canadian version of the FCC. Hopefully that means we’ll see this device go north sometime soon.

And in other news, the new Kindle Fire tablets are once again eschewing Google.  They’re set up to use Bing as the default search engine, not Google Search, and that suggests an ongoing power struggle between Amazon and Google.

FCC ID (ZHS-1013)

FCC ID (CO2-2105)

56 Broken Kindle Screens (video)

At one point or another we’ve all seen a broken ereader screen but the following video showing the graphic aftereffects of the death of so many ereaders will likely be unsettling to some. Viewer discretion is advised.

A pair of artists, Sebastian Schmieg and Silvio Lorusso, have just published a new book which takes a look at damaged ereader screens. They’ve found and assembled a collection of 56 E-ink screens broken due to impact and torsion damage, and then released the set as a POD book (Lulu).

It’s a startling set of images, including several that, as a result of the damage, become a collage of what was on the screen before and after the damage. Some of the damaged screens apparently broke the data connection to a segment of the screen, thus preserving some part of the last useful info displayed. That is an effect I had not seen before.

You can watch the following video to see what the broken screens would look like on a Kindle Touch, but if you want to see what the book looks like I would check out one of the artists' websites (here).

The effect is quite different between this video and the book. The images are positioned so that the screenshot are positioned on each page so they look like they’re on a device, not pictures in an art book. That’s a clever touch.

I don’t know about you, but I’d never considered the broken screens as art before. Whenever I had been shown a broken screen on a device I had always noted the technical details of when and how it was broken. But it was just another dead device, not a piece of art. The fact that it was on a gadget kept me from valuing the image as art, which is itself a lesson in how the medium sometimes is as important as the message.

You can find images like the ones in this book on Flickr and other photo sharing sites. Or at least you can find photos of the broken devices. I’m sure you may have seen them from time to time, but if it never occurred to you to observe them as art and not failed engineering then the medium overwhelemd the message.

via Triangulation

No text to speech in Amazon’s new Paperwhite Kindles: Why? To push us toward Fire tablets and boost Amazon-owned Audible?

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos ballyhooed text to speech in the Kindle 2 in 2009.

But guess what’s now missing from the new Paperwhite Kindles even though it’s still present in the Kindle Keyboard 3G and Kindle DX models? TTS, aka “Read to Me.”

Tipped off by a Gizmodo review noting the absence of an audio jack, I called the Kindle support people Thursday and learned that the Paperwhite models would be mute. Bummer. For years, I’ve complained of E Ink’s contrast problems, and the new models are said to offer 25 percent more contrast, not just glow with less eyestrain than LCDs.

The news from Support jibes with a table comparing various models on the Amazon site (scroll down toward the bottom of this Amazon page). Notice? The table lists the Paperwhite models as lacking the speakers that high-end models offer.

So, Jeff, what’s the strategy here, given the diminishment of the usefulness of the Paperwhite models for the people with dyslexia or other learning or vision challenges? Especially, how about students? Don’t you hope to crack the education market? Dumb move, this muting. Speech chips cost a pittance, so that excuse just will not fly. If you don’t want a speaker or there isn’t room for one, at least include a headphone jack. Just how could you be so out of touch with customers in this instance? I actually was hoping Amazon would go in the other direction and do TTS right with “Amy” and other refined voices from the whizzes at Ivona (or would pick up the equivalents from a similar company).

In silencing the Paperwhites, was Amazon trying to extend the market life of the TTS-enabled Kindle Keyboard 3G and the DX? And nudge consumers toward the Fire models that can play digital audio books from Audible, part of the Bezos empire? Or cozy up to publishers or literary agents? A smarter move would be for Amazon to take a strong stand in favor of TTS while at the same time encouraging Audible to offer extras, such as author interviews, so that audiobooks still paid off. Anti-TTS strategies will actually reduce opportunities for writers. I want the print-impaired and joggers to be able to enjoy my books, and TTS make this more likely to happen.

No matter what the explanation for The Great Muting, Jeff, I’d be grateful for your personal pledge that text to speech will be a feature of all future Kindles, including the basic models (apparently audio of any kind was also missing from the the bottom-of-the-line Kindle introduce last year, and is still AWOL from the $69 successor).

At the very least, TTS needs to be in mainstream E Ink machines like the Paperwhite models.

I hope that librarians and advocates for people with disabilities will besiege Amazon with demands for TTS for all models. Same for joggers and walkers and others who would rather listen to their books when they need to pay special attention to their surroundings. (Yes, I do plead guilty to e-reading at times while walking—when conditions are safe enough.)

Of course, this is one more reason for librarians and others to support the Digital Public LIbrary of America, the ePub format, the battle against DRM and other efforts that would reduce our reliance on the proprietary technology.

Look, Jeff, it isn’t as if I’m anti-Amazon—I applaud your people’s innovative ways and stellar customer service, and I’ve sent thousands of dollars in Seattle’s direction over the years despite my less than full satisfaction with Amazon’s labor practices. I am not calling for a boycott and, in fact, have ordered a Paperwhite 3G. But I do believe that librarians and others should use whatever clout they can summon up to remind you of your social obligations, especially when Amazon may earn millions in tax money from some major Kindle-related federal contracts. Even if the Kindles in those cases have TTS, it would be extremely bad karma to reduce options in that area for ordinary users.

In so proudly demonstrating the Kindle 2?s TTS back in 2009, Jeff Bezos said: "Any book, blog, magazine, or personal document can be read aloud to you. If you’re in the kitchen cooking and want to be read to for a little while, or you’re on your commute to work and you want to be read to for a little while, Kindle can do that for you. Let’s listen…"

Yes, let’s listen. And, Jeff, you do the same. Unmute the Paperwhites! Ideally you could even give people with existing orders the choice of either accepting the silent Paperwhites or getting a slight discount on future models with the speech chips.

And speaking of good ergonomics—for everyone, not just people with print impairments: I notice that Kobo’s Glo model lets people vary the boldness of the characters. When will Amazon finally heed me and build this feature in? When I owned TeleRead, I begged vendors to oblige. Nice to see Kobo acting, whether or not I was the inspiration.

reposted from Library City under a CC license

This Weekend in Urbana, IL: Estate Book Sale of Project Gutenberg Founder Michael Hart

Are you going to be in the vicinity of Urbana, IL this weekend? There’s a little paper book estate sale you might want to stop by. Now, normally we probably wouldn’t make such a big deal about paper book sales, but this happens to be the the estate sale of Michael Hart—the founder of Project Gutenberg, and one of the principal reasons we can read e-books on handheld devices today.

The sale site is posted in the form of an amusingly cheeky WordPress blog, with pictures of some of the books that will be offered for sale. The ground rules for the sale include the fact that books with cover prices will be sold at those prices—including old pre-inflation paperbacks. Also, the sale will start promptly at 9, with no early-birds permitted, and they express a hope that most books will go to individual readers, not dealers.

Ordinarily, I’d think it was kind of sad to see a man’s collection of books parceled out after he passed away—but Michael Hart dedicated his life to promoting reading. I’d like to think he would approve of seeing his books go to other people who would like to read them in turn.

New App Brings Augmented Reality Ghosts to the iPad in All Their Appropriate Fuzzyness

The kids books publisher Goosebottom Books is planning to release a ghost-themed augmented reality book next month and they’ve just posted a demo on their website.

The book is called Horrible Hauntings, and it’s a cute look at some of the more famous ghost stories like the Headless Horseman, the Amherst Poltergeist, the Flying Dutchman, and Bloody Mary. All in all there are ten historical ghost stories in this book (pity there’s no Myrtle), and they are  brought to life via the tricks of augmented reality.

You’ll need to buy the book and download the iOS or Android app, but once you do you’ll be able to use the rear facing camera to see and interact with the ghosts. There’s even going to be a scene where you can take the role of a poltergeist and send objects (chairs, an umbrella, vases, and chamber pots) flying around the room.According to one of the developers, there are other simple games embedded in the app, including a spot where you can have the skeletons play ball or blow on the sales of the Flying Dutchman, which fill up when you blow on them.

You can check out the demo video at the end, but I don’t think this is going to work out very well. First and foremost, I’m going to have to agree with one of my readers in that I don’t see the point of requiring an iPad as well as the book in order to use the better parts of the book.

But more importantly, this particular AR trick isn’t working well for me because I’m having issues with the camera on my iPad 2. But that’s a sub-1MB camera anyway, so I wouldn’t expect it to do much in the first place. Here’s what I see on my screen:
As you can see, it looks awfully fuzzy. Assuming this is par for image quality on the iPad 2, I really don’t see the point of using it to support augmented reality apps. It’s just not worth it.

Once again augmented reality is little more than a gimmick. I think this app would be better off if the publishers simply dropped any requirement that the book be involved. But then they wouldn’t be able to pitch the app based on the gee-whiz value of augmented reality, and without that I’m not sure anyone would be writing about them today.

I Wouldn’t Read Too Much into That Story about Bruce Willis' iTunes Music Collection

There’s a hot story going around today about Bruce Willis and his plans to fight to pass his digital music collection to his daughters when he dies. According to the Daily Mail,

The Hollywood action hero is said to be considering legal action against technology giant Apple over his desire to leave his digital music collection to his daughters.

…

Since Willis – who occasionally sings with a blues band and has appeared in a video for Damon Albarn’s band Gorillaz – has apparently spent thousands of dollars downloading music on to ‘many, many iPods’, he is keen to be able to hand it on legitimately to daughters Rumer, Scout and Tallaluh.

I’m really not sure how much weight we should put in this story. It just doesn’t add up in a number of different categories.

Update: And now the story has been denied by Mrs. Bruce Willis. Told you so.

I was planning to write about this story and how it relates to ebooks, but since that is something of a stretch I sat back and contemplated the story while planning my route of attack.  I kept reading the original article, looking for the best points to raise, and I noticed that there were a number of details missing.

If you’ve only read one of the reposted copied stories, I suggest that you go read the original. One thing you won’t find there is any statement from Bruce Willis or his spokesman about the topic. That’s not such a big deal, but I’d like to know where the info came from in order to evaluate the credibility of that source.

You might also notice the absence of references to any past stories about Mr. Willis' efforts in this area. Normally that wouldn’t be a big deal (my Google-fu is high), but in this case I can’t find anything in Google either.

And I’m not done. Have you considered where the story was published? It was in the Daily Mail, a right wing UK tabloid that is not widely regarded for its accuracy. While that by itself is not enough to condemn this article, it does start to add up.

And finally, has anyone considered how much Bruce Willis would really care about having "spent thousands of dollars downloading music"? The guy is reportedly worth $150 million. The music collection would have to hit 5 digits to get beyond being a rounding error for his  personal net worth. Heck, I bet his annual lawyer costs are higher than the amount spent on that music collection.

Do you really think he’s going to spend more than a couple minutes of time making sure his daughters could keep the music?  At best this might be a footnote in the legal docs somewhere (right after the cars), but I seriously doubt that it’s the focal point.

Now, I’m not saying that he doesn’t believe in this issue, but I don’t know that the original article is describing his motivations accurately. He might even really be funding the legislation in 5 states, but if he is I would bet his interest is more philanthropic than personal.

All I know today is that the Daily Mail article is not trustworthy. It does not stand up to scrutiny.

image by andyarthur